跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以高频资产收益和价格跳跃为对象,并处理交易摩擦及跳跃回归推断,高频计量是最直接的分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jia Li
Viktor Todorov
George Tauchen
Rui Chen

混合时间尺度跳跃回归与自助法推断

研究问题
利用高频资产收益估计跳跃反应时,如何兼顾解释变量大幅跳跃的定位精度与较不活跃资产的交易摩擦问题?
方法与思路
作者以精细时间尺度定位解释变量的稀有大跳跃,再以较粗尺度估计回归,并构造自助法处理无法学生化的非标准分布。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称自助法具有渐近有效性及更高阶近似;股票应用中市场跳跃反应较稳定,而行业跳跃反应更嘈杂且不稳定。
阅读关注点
应核对两种尺度和跳跃阈值的选择、交易摩擦假设,以及自助法如何反映干扰量估计误差并构造检验与置信区间。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,尺度选择条件、模拟数值及股票差异未说明;应用结论限于所考察样本,不能推广至所有资产。

原文摘要

We develop an efficient mixed-scale estimator for jump regressions using high-frequency asset returns. A fine time scale is used to accurately identify the locations of large rare jumps in the explanatory variables such as the price of the market portfolio. A coarse scale is then used in the estimation in order to attenuate the effect of trading frictions in the dependent variable such as the prices of potentially less liquid assets. The proposed estimator has a non-standard asymptotic distribution that cannot be made asymptotically pivotal via studentization. We propose a novel bootstrap procedure for feasible inference and justify its asymptotic validity. We show that the bootstrap provides an automatic higher-order asymptotic approximation by accounting for the sampling variation in estimates of nuisance quantities that are used in efficient estimation. The Monte Carlo analysis indicates good finite-sample performance of the general specification test and confidence intervals based on the bootstrap. We apply the method to a high-frequency panel of Dow stock prices together with the market index defined by the S&P 500 index futures over the period 2007–2014. We document remarkable temporal stability in the way that stocks react to market jumps. However, this relationship for many of the stocks in the sample is significantly noisier and more unstable during sector-specific jump events.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文