Vector Autoregressions and Macroeconomic Modeling: An Error Taxonomy
向量自回归与宏观经济建模:误差分类AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究宏观向量自回归的滞后截断、动态刻画及时间序列推断误差。
向量自回归与宏观经济建模:误差分类AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In this article, we investigate the theoretical behavior of finite lag VAR(n)$\text{VAR}(n)$ models fitted to time series that in truth come from an infinite-order VAR(∞)$\text{VAR}(\infty)$ data-generating mechanism. We show that the overall error can be broken down into two basic components, an estimation error that stems from the difference between the parameter estimates and their population ensemble VAR(n)$\text{VAR}(n)$ counterparts, and an approximation error that stems from the difference between the VAR(n)$\text{VAR}(n)$ and the true VAR(∞)$\text{VAR}(\infty)$. The two sources of error are shown to be present in other performance indicators previously employed in the literature to characterize, so-called, truncation effects. Our theoretical analysis indicates that the magnitude of the estimation error exceeds that of the approximation error, but experimental results based upon a prototypical real business cycle model and a practical example indicate that the approximation error approaches its asymptotic position far more slowly than does the estimation error, their relative orders of magnitude notwithstanding. The experimental results suggest that with sample sizes and lag lengths like those commonly employed in practice VAR(n)$\text{VAR}(n)$ models are likely to exhibit serious errors of both types when attempting to replicate the dynamics of the true underlying process and that inferences based on VAR(n)$\text{VAR}(n)$ models can be very untrustworthy.