Analysis of Two-Way Layout of Count Data Involving Multiple Counts in Each Cell
每格含多个计数的双因素布局分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般双因素计数布局和离散检验,未明确对应所列经济计量细分领域。
每格含多个计数的双因素布局分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Multiple counts may occur in each cell of an a × b two-way layout (balanced or unbalanced) of two fixed factors A and B. Standard log-linear model analysis based on a Poisson distribution assumption of the cell counts is not applicable here, because of the unbalanced nature of the table or because the Poisson distribution assumption is not valid. We develop C(α) tests for interaction and main effects assuming data to be Poisson distributed and also assuming that data within the cells have extra (over/under) dispersion beyond that explained by a Poisson distribution. For this we consider an extended negative binominal distribution and a semiparametric model using the quasi-likelihood. We show that in all situations the C(α) tests for interaction are of very simple forms. For C(α) tests for the main effect in presence of no interaction, such simplification is possible only under certain conditions. A score test for detecting extra dispersion in presence of interaction is also obtained and is of simple form. This test is to be used before testing for interaction. If evidence of extra dispersion is found, then the score tests for testing for interaction developed under the assumption of extra-dispersed distributions is used; otherwise, the score test developed under the assumption of a Poisson distribution is used. Further, maximum likelihood (ML) and quasi-likelihood (QL) estimates under different relevant null hypotheses are obtained. For testing for interaction under the assumption of Poisson-distributed data, we show that to obtain ML estimates of a + b - 1 parameters, we need to solve only min(a - 1, b - 1) equations simultaneously. For example, for a 2 × 10 table we need to solve only one equation iteratively. When data are extra dispersed, we need to solve a + b equations simultaneously to obtain ML or QL estimates of the a + b parameters. For testing for a main effect in the absence of interaction, closed-form estimates exist when data are Poisson distributed. However, when data follow a negative binomial or a semiparametric model based on the knowledge of only the first two moments (quasi-likelihood), only one equation involving the dispersion parameter is to be solved iteratively. Some simulations are performed, and two real datasets are analyzed for illustrative purposes.
This article introduces a framework for evaluating statistical decisions under both prior ambiguity and likelihood misspecification. We begin with an ambiguity set - a frequentist model that pairs a possibly misspecified likelihood with every possible prior - and uniformly expand it by a Kullback-Leibler radius to accommodate likelihood misspecification. We show that optimal decisions under this framework are equivalent to minimax decisions with an exponentially tilted loss…
弱依赖非线性时间序列模型准似然估计量的一致高斯近似
We study estimation and inference for a semiparametric class of time series models that specify only the conditional expectation, which is a known link function applied to a linear combination of past observations and covariates. The class covers count, binary, bounded and conditionally heteroskedastic responses within a single formulation, and the parameter is estimated by a quasi-likelihood estimating equation based on the first conditional moment. Under stationarity and a…
靶向深度生存对比:神经网络下处理特定生存收益的有效推断
Neural survival models are increasingly asked to support counterfactual claims---how much a treatment would change survival in a population---rather than only prognostic risk scores. Answering such questions from observational data requires valid inference for treatment-specific survival contrasts under confounding and covariate-dependent censoring, targets for which standard deep survival estimators are biased and provide no honest uncertainty. We propose Targeted Deep…
竞争风险生存结局的亚组平均处理效应双重稳健目标估计
In recent years, precision treatment strategies have gained significant attention in medical research, particularly for patient care. We propose a novel framework for estimating subgroup average treatment effects (ATE) in time-to-event data with competing risks, using ICU patients with sepsis as an illustrative example. Our approach, based on cumulative incidence functions and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), achieves both asymptotic efficiency and double…
用多项式最大化方法估计具有非对称非高斯新息的 ARIMA 模型
Classical estimators for ARIMA parameters (MLE, CSS, OLS) assume Gaussian innovations, an assumption frequently violated in financial and economic data exhibiting asymmetric distributions with heavy tails. We develop and validate the second-order polynomial maximization method (PMM2) for estimating ARIMA$(p,d,q)$ models with non-Gaussian innovations. PMM2 is a semiparametric technique that exploits higher-order moments and cumulants without requiring full distributional…
通向同一答案的三条路径:协调 AIPW、TMLE 与双重机器学习
Augmented inverse-probability weighting (AIPW), targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), and double/debiased machine learning (DML) are three routes to the same efficient influence function for the average treatment effect --- settled theory we treat as background. This tutorial's contribution is its worked, shared-nuisance reconciliation on real data: what a practitioner must actually match for the routes, and the software packages, to agree. Working the effect of…