跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究高维选择后区间与经验贝叶斯覆盖,未明确对应所列经济计量应用细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
J. T. Gene Hwang
Zhigen Zhao

高维数据中被选参数的经验贝叶斯置信区间

研究问题
在同一批高维数据中先按最大 t 统计量选择参数、再进行区间推断时,如何避免忽略选择的失效与保守校正的信息损失?
方法与思路
作者在正态观测、方差不等且未知的设定下构造经验贝叶斯区间,以对一类先验统一控制贝叶斯覆盖概率或错误覆盖率评价有效性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所提区间可对被选参数给出有效且较紧的推断;在随机效应为目标参数的混合模型中,所述覆盖标准对应频率覆盖标准。
阅读关注点
应核对先验类及统一控制的条件、覆盖概率与错误覆盖率的区别、混合模型中的频率解释,以及任意选择规则是否仅属预期。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化。任意选择规则的有效性在摘要中只是预期;所述覆盖保证也不能直接推广到任意固定参数。

原文摘要

Modern statistical problems often involve a large number of populations and hence a large number of parameters that characterize these populations. It is common for scientists to use data to select the most significant populations, such as those with the largest t statistics. The scientific interest often lies in studying and making inferences regarding these parameters, called the selected parameters, corresponding to the selected populations. The current statistical practices either apply a traditional procedure assuming there were no selection—a practice that is not valid—or they use the Bonferroni-type procedure that is valid but very conservative and often noninformative. In this article, we propose valid and sharp confidence intervals that allow scientists to select parameters and to make inferences for the selected parameters based on the same data. This type of confidence interval allows the users to zero in on the most interesting selected parameters without collecting more data. The validity of confidence intervals is defined as the controlling of Bayes coverage probability so that it is no less than a nominal level uniformly over a class of prior distributions for the parameter. When a mixed model is assumed and the random effects are the key parameters, this validity criterion is exactly the frequentist criterion, since the Bayes coverage probability is identical to the frequentist coverage probability. Assuming that the observations are normally distributed with unequal and unknown variances, we select parameters with the largest t statistics. We then construct sharp empirical Bayes confidence intervals for these selected parameters, which have either a large Bayes coverage probability or a small Bayes false coverage rate uniformly for a class of priors. Our intervals, applicable to any high-dimensional data, are applied to microarray data and are shown to be better than all the alternatives. It is also anticipated that the same intervals would be valid for any selection rule. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文