跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究多维分位前沿、收入与健康联合分布、贫困测量及随机占优。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Esfandiar Maasoumi
Jeffrey S. Racine

多维聚合函数的识别与估计:福祉分位前沿应用

研究问题
多维福祉评价中,如何识别不同指标的聚合权重与替代关系,并刻画不同群体、不同分位位置的评价异质性?
方法与思路
作者先非参数识别连续与离散指标的条件联合分布及分位前沿,再给出参数等价表征,并使用多元随机占优检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法将指标间关系纳入权重估计,支持多维贫困评价;印度尼西亚应用显示个体评价函数存在广泛异质性。
阅读关注点
应核对前沿的识别条件、参数等价与理想聚合器的定义,以及弱一致排序和随机占优检验所允许的比较范围。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断聚合函数的唯一性、估计稳健性的条件或应用细节;所获权重也不能直接视为福利规范。

原文摘要

We propose a new technique for identification and estimation of aggregation functions in multidimensional evaluations and multiple indicator settings. These functions may represent “latent” objects. They occur in many different contexts, for instance in propensity scores, multivariate measures of well-being and the related analysis of inequality and poverty, and in equivalence scales. Technical advances allow nonparametric inference on the joint distribution of continuous and discrete indicators of well-being, such as income and health, conditional on joint values of other continuous and discrete attributes, such as education and geographical groupings. In a multi-attribute setting, “quantiles” are “frontiers” that define equivalent sets of covariate values. We identify these frontiers nonparametrically at first. Then we suggest “parametrically equivalent” characterizations of these frontiers that reveal likely weights for, and substitutions between different attributes for different groups, and at different quantiles. These estimated parametric functionals are “ideal” aggregators in a certain sense which we make clear. They correspond directly to measures of aggregate well-being popularized in the earliest multidimensional inequality measures in Maasoumi (1986). This new approach resolves a classic problem of assigning weights to multiple indicators such as dimensions of well-being, as well as empirically incorporating the key component in multidimensional analysis, the relationship between the indicators. It introduces a new way for robust estimation of “quantile frontiers”, allowing “complete” assessments, such as multidimensional poverty measurements. In our substantive application, we discover extensive heterogeneity in individual evaluation functions. This leads us to perform robust, weak uniform rankings as afforded by tests for multivariate stochastic dominance. A demonstration is provided based on the Indonesian data analyzed for multidimensional poverty in Maasoumi and Lugo (2008).

笔记与分组
相关领域论文