Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes and Partial Welfare Ordering
最优动态处理规则与福利的部分排序AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究工具变量下动态处理规则的反事实福利、部分识别及政策比较。
最优动态处理规则与福利的部分排序AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Dynamic treatment regimes are treatment allocations tailored to heterogeneous individuals (e.g., via previous outcomes and covariates).The optimal dynamic treatment regime is a regime that maximizes counterfactual welfare.We introduce a framework in which we can partially learn the optimal dynamic regime from observational data, relaxing the sequential randomization assumption commonly employed in the literature but instead using (binary) instrumental variables.We propose the notion of sharp partial ordering of counterfactual welfares with respect to dynamic regimes and establish mapping from data to partial ordering via a set of linear programs.We then characterize the identified set of the optimal regime as the set of maximal elements associated with the partial ordering.We relate the notion of partial ordering with a more conventional notion of partial identification using topological sorts.Practically, topological sorts can be served as a policy benchmark for a policymaker.We apply our method to understand returns to schooling and post-school training as a sequence of treatments by combining data from multiple sources.The framework of this article can be used beyond the current context, for example, in establishing rankings of multiple treatments or policies across different counterfactual scenarios.Supplementary materials for this article are available online.