跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论相依时间序列、波动率建模及 ARCH、GARCH 等模型的比较。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

相依与独立时间序列

研究问题
在误差存在相依性的时间序列中,如何利用一般椭圆分布建立似然与波动率模型,并评价常见层级模型之间的差异证据?
方法与思路
作者在一般椭圆分布下讨论相依样本似然及独立情形,并通过修改 BIC 和引入差异证据等级来比较波动率模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出相依样本下的似然视角及模型比较准则,并称所考察示例未显示 ARCH、GARCH 等层级模型具有明显优势。
阅读关注点
应核对联合分布与相依结构的定义、似然是否可计算,以及修改 BIC 的推导、证据等级阈值和示例比较的有效性。
阅读边界
所据为 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收均未核实;摘要表述较概括,未给出分布、准则公式或可推广的比较结论。

原文摘要

The time series theory is set in this work under the domain of general elliptically contoured distributions. The advent of a time series approach that is in accordance with the expected reality of dependence between errors, transfers the increasingly complex and difficult to handle correlation analysis into a discipline that models volatility from a new view of a likelihood based on dependent probabilistic samples. The equally important problem of model selection is strengthened, but at the same time criticized with the introduction of degrees of evidence of significant difference in the modified BIC criterion . The demanding scale of differentiation puts a well-known database in trouble by observing insignificant relevance between the hierarchical models most used in the theory of time series under independence, such as Arch, Garch, Tgarch and Egarch. For extreme cases where the probabilistic independence of the samples is exceptionally demonstrated by an expert, the article also proposes the theory of time series under elliptical models, but with the same demanding comparison of the degrees of evidence of differences of the modified BIC. The example studied under this approach also does not denote any advantage of the hierarchical models studied. Such a new perspective for a likelihood based on dependent probabilistic samples has arisen naturally in similar context in finance under the setting of multivector variate distributions.

笔记与分组