跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用选择后推断与多重检验,未明确对应所列因果、分布效应或金融方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Asaf Weinstein
William Fithian
Yoav Benjamini

更有利于判定符号的选择调整置信区间

研究问题
仅为估计值超过阈值的参数构造区间时,如何修正选择造成的覆盖失真,同时缩短区间并更早判断参数符号?
方法与思路
作者在对称单峰分布的位置参数框架下,条件于估计值超过阈值构造三类区间,并讨论数据依赖阈值下的覆盖错误率。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提出兼顾长度与符号判断的条件区间,并为多种检验程序讨论错误覆盖陈述率控制,另有大量相关系数的应用。
阅读关注点
核对条件覆盖与错误覆盖陈述率的区别、分布限制及阈值处理,检查区间构造和提前判定符号所付出的长度代价。
阅读边界
材料为 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;具体区间公式、适用检验程序和依赖条件未提供,不能推广到任意选择规则。

原文摘要

In many current large-scale problems, confidence intervals (CIs) are constructed only for the parameters that are large, as indicated by their estimators, ignoring the smaller parameters. Such selective inference poses a problem to the usual marginal CIs that no longer offer the right level of coverage, not even on the average over the selected parameters. We address this problem by developing three methods to construct short and valid CIs for the location parameter of a symmetric unimodal distribution, while conditioning on its estimator being larger than some constant threshold. In two of these methods, the CI is further required to offer early sign determination, that is, to avoid including parameters of both signs for relatively small values of the estimator. One of the two, the Conditional Quasi-Conventional CI, offers a good balance between length and sign determination while protecting from the effect of selection. The CI is not symmetric, extending more toward 0 than away from it, nor is it of constant shape. However, when the estimator is far away from the threshold, the proposed CI tends to the usual marginal one. In spite of its complexity, it is specified by closed form expressions, up to a small set of constants that are each the solution of a single variable equation. When multiple testing procedures are used to control the false discovery rate or other error rates, the resulting threshold for selecting may be data dependent. We show that conditioning the above CIs on the data-dependent threshold still offers false coverage-statement rate (FCR) for many widely used testing procedures. For these reasons, the conditional CIs for the parameters selected this way are an attractive alternative to the available general FCR adjusted intervals. We demonstrate the use of the method in the analysis of some 14,000 correlations between hormone change and brain activity change in response to the subjects being exposed to stressful movie clips. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文