跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以通过精确或模拟最大似然估计的离散选择模型作为主要应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Denis Bolduc
Lynda Khalaf
Clément Yélou

参数比值的识别稳健置信集及其离散选择应用

研究问题
参数比值在分母接近零或识别不足时,如何构造多个比值的同时置信集,并避免常规有界区间造成推断失真?
方法与思路
作者反演无需识别比值的联合检验,构造 Fieller 型区域,再通过投影得到同时置信集,并推导相关线性变换的闭式解。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法允许无界置信集,并在被反演统计量具有可处理精确分布时提供精确推断;还给出离散选择模拟与应用。
阅读关注点
应核对联合检验与投影的覆盖率条件、比值线性变换的适用范围,以及精确推断和渐近推断在应用中的区别。
阅读边界
仅据所给 RePEc 出版社摘要,无法判断全部模型中的有限样本覆盖率;所称方法优势与精确性均不能脱离各自条件。

原文摘要

We study the problem of building confidence sets for ratios of parameters, from an identification robust perspective. In particular, we address the simultaneous confidence set estimation of a finite number of ratios. Results apply to a wide class of models suitable for estimation by consistent asymptotically normal procedures. Conventional methods (e.g. the delta method) derived by excluding the parameter discontinuity regions entailed by the ratio functions and which typically yield bounded confidence limits, break down even if the sample size is large (Dufour, 1997). One solution to this problem, which we take in this paper, is to use variants of Fieller's (1940, 1954) method. By inverting a joint test that does not require identifying the ratios, Fieller-based confidence regions are formed for the full set of ratios. Simultaneous confidence sets for individual ratios are then derived by applying projection techniques, which allow for possibly unbounded outcomes. In this paper, we provide simple explicit closed-form analytical solutions for projection-based simultaneous confidence sets, in the case of linear transformations of ratios. Our solution further provides a formal proof for the expressions in Zerbe et al. (1982) pertaining to individual ratios. We apply the geometry of quadrics as introduced by (Dufour and Taamouti, 2005) and (Dufour and Taamouti, 2007), in a different although related context. The confidence sets so obtained are exact if the inverted test statistic admits a tractable exact distribution, for instance in the normal linear regression context. The proposed procedures are applied and assessed via illustrative Monte Carlo and empirical examples, with a focus on discrete choice models estimated by exact or simulation-based maximum likelihood. Our results underscore the superiority of Fieller-based methods.

笔记与分组