跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究社会网络中的有向关系、个体对依赖和网络模型估计,明确对应网络与干扰方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
David Strauss
Michael Ikeda

社会网络的伪似然估计

研究问题
社会网络模型包含个体对之间的依赖时,如何以便于计算的统一方法拟合多种模型,并比较其拟合与参数复杂度?
方法与思路
作者最大化各二元变量给定其余数据的条件概率之积,并说明该伪似然估计等价于可用标准软件实现的加权最小二乘。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该方法便于比较多类网络模型;在可比较的情形中与最大似然表现相近,实例提示更简约模型也能合理拟合。
阅读关注点
应核对条件概率与加权最小二乘的对应关系、网络依赖设定,以及与最大似然比较的范围和模型简约性的判断标准。
阅读边界
依据稿件版本未注明的索引摘要;表现相近及过度参数化是所述实例中的观察,不能据此认定普遍有效或同等统计效率。

原文摘要

Interest in log-linear modeling for social-network data has grown steadily since Holland and Leinhardt (1981) proposed their p 1 model. That model was designed for a single binary relationship (directed graph) representing interactions between individuals. It assumed that interactions between pairs of individuals are mutually independent. Subsequent work has extended the model in various ways, including block-modeling and the case of dependence between pairs of individuals. In empirical work it would often be desirable to fit a wide variety of these models, as the differences in predictions or goodness of fit are likely to provide insights into the data. This has not been common practice, however, because estimation for some of the models has been difficult, and the maximum likelihood schemes developed for others involve different computer programs not always available in standard packages. The focus of this article is on a general estimation technique that maximizes the pseudolikelihood, the product of the probabilities of the binary variables, with each probability conditional on the rest of the data. The method is shown to be equivalent to a weighted least squares procedure and thus can be carried out with standard computer packages. In cases where true maximum likelihood estimation is available for comparison the two methods seem to work about equally well. The pseudolikelihood estimation is used in an example where the fits of a large number of different models are compared. Some of these models, such as various Markov block models, have not previously been proposed. In this example (as in others considered) it appears that the p 1-type models are overparameterized, and that much more parsimonious models give tolerable fits.

笔记与分组