跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究聚类数据与信息性簇大小,未明确涉及纵向面板、因果识别或其他所列细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
J. M. Neuhaus
C. E. McCulloch

信息性簇大小下广义线性混合模型的协变量效应估计

研究问题
当簇大小与响应共享随机效应时,忽略信息性簇大小会怎样影响混合模型及条件似然方法对截距和协变量效应的估计?
方法与思路
作者通过解析计算、模拟与牙周疾病案例,考察共享随机效应设定下忽略信息性簇大小的分析,重点研究极大似然方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称偏差与协变量及相关随机效应的关联有关;仅含随机截距时,忽略信息性簇大小可使截距有偏而协变量效应偏差较小。
阅读关注点
应核对协变量与随机效应独立的表述如何对应各类效应,以及随机截距、其他随机效应和簇大小机制下的偏差边界。
阅读边界
所给 OpenAlex 摘要版本未注明;“偏差较小”不等于无偏,具体条件和数值未提供,也不能推广为忽略簇大小总是安全。

原文摘要

In standard regression analyses of clustered data, one typically assumes that the expected value of the response is independent of cluster size. However, this is often false. For example, in studies of surgical interventions, investigators have frequently found surgery volume and outcomes to be related to the skill level of the surgeons. This paper examines the effect of ignoring response-dependent, informative, cluster sizes on standard analytical methods such as mixed-effects models and conditional likelihood methods using analytic calculations, simulation studies and an example from a study of periodontal disease. We consider the case in which cluster sizes and responses share random effects which we assume to be independent of the covariates. Our focus is on maximum likelihood methods that ignore informative cluster sizes, and we show that they exhibit little bias in estimating covariate effects that are uncorrelated with the random effects associated with cluster sizes. However, estimation of covariate effects that are associated with the random effects can be biased. In particular, for models with random intercepts only, ignoring informative cluster sizes can yield biased estimators of the intercept but little bias in estimation of all covariate effects.

笔记与分组