Robust Jump Regressions
稳健跳跃回归AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用高频离散观测、价格跳跃及金融市场闪崩实例,研究目标直接属于金融高频计量方法。
稳健跳跃回归AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We develop robust inference methods for studying linear dependence between the jumps of discretely observed processes at high frequency. Unlike classical linear regressions, jump regressions are determined by a small number of jumps occurring over a fixed time interval and the rest of the components of the processes around the jump times. The latter are the continuous martingale parts of the processes as well as observation noise. By sampling more frequently the role of these components, which are hidden in the observed price, shrinks asymptotically. The robustness of our inference procedure is with respect to outliers, which are of particular importance in the current setting of relatively small number of jump observations. This is achieved by using nonsmooth loss functions (like L1) in the estimation. Unlike classical robust methods, the limit of the objective function here remains nonsmooth. The proposed method is also robust to measurement error in the observed processes, which is achieved by locally smoothing the high-frequency increments. In an empirical application to financial data, we illustrate the usefulness of the robust techniques by contrasting the behavior of robust and ordinary least regression (OLS)-type jump regressions in periods including disruptions of the financial markets such as so-called “flash crashes.” Supplementary materials for this article are available online.