跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究微生物成分比较及检验间图结构,未提供因果识别或所列网络与干扰方向的充分证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jialiang Mao
Yuhan Chen
Li Ma

微生物组数据的贝叶斯图形成分回归

研究问题
如何在组内异质性较大且可能存在混杂变量时,检验并刻画不同样本组之间的微生物组成差异?
方法与思路
作者结合系统发育树上的局部检验、连接局部检验的图模型和贝叶斯检验,纳入协变量并积分消除组内变异。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称框架允许分类单元间共享信息;饮食数据分析发现组成关联对协变量调整敏感,强调谨慎纳入潜在混杂因素。
阅读关注点
应核对成分数据与系统发育树的处理、局部检验的依赖结构、贝叶斯检验规则,以及协变量选择如何影响结论。
阅读边界
来源为版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;饮食应用报告的是观察性关联,调整协变量不能据此证明因果关系,也不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

An important task in microbiome studies is to test the existence of and give characterization to differences in the microbiome composition across groups of samples. Important challenges of this problem include the large within-group heterogeneities among samples and the existence of potential confounding variables that, when ignored, increase the chance of false discoveries and reduce the power for identifying true differences. We propose a probabilistic framework to overcome these issues by combining three ideas: (i) a phylogenetic tree-based decomposition of the cross-group comparison problem into a series of local tests, (ii) a graphical model that links the local tests to allow information sharing across taxa, and (iii) a Bayesian testing strategy that incorporates covariates and integrates out the within-group variation, avoiding potentially unstable point estimates. With the proposed method, we analyze the American Gut data to compare the gut microbiome composition of groups of participants with different dietary habits. Our analysis shows that (i) the frequency of consuming fruit, seafood, vegetable, and whole grain are closely related to the gut microbiome composition and (ii) the conclusion of the analysis can change drastically when different sets of relevant covariates are adjusted, indicating the necessity of carefully selecting and including possible confounders in the analysis when comparing microbiome compositions with data from observational studies. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文