跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于一般核密度估计与带宽选择理论,未明确对应所列经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Peter Hall
J. S. Marron

交叉验证函数中的局部极小值

研究问题
核密度估计的最小二乘交叉验证为何经常出现多个局部极小值?论文研究其波动程度及虚假极小值所在带宽区域。
方法与思路
作者将交叉验证函数建模为高斯随机过程,以渐近分析刻画其波动对真实密度和核函数的依赖,并用模拟检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,理论解释并量化了多个局部极小值现象,还表明虚假局部极小值更容易出现在偏小而非偏大的带宽处。
阅读关注点
应核对高斯过程近似的条件、衡量函数波动的量、密度与核函数的作用,以及渐近分析与有限样本模拟的一致程度。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;未提供近似条件、相关泛函或数值结果,不能据此断言某种核或优化算法更优。

原文摘要

SUMMARY The method of least squares cross-validation for choosing the bandwidth of a kernel density estimator has been the object of considerable research, through both theoretical analysis and simulation studies. The method involves the minimization of a certain function of the bandwidth. One of the less attractive features of this method, which has been observed in simulation studies but has not previously been understood theoretically, is that rather often the cross-validation function has multiple local minima. The theoretical results of this paper provide an explanation and quantification of this empirical observation, through modelling the cross-validation function as a Gaussian stochastic process. Asymptotic analysis reveals that the degree of wiggliness of the cross-validation function depends on the underlying density through a fairly simple functional, but dependence on the kernel function is much more complicated. A simulation study explores the extent to which the asymptotic analysis describes the actual situation. Our techniques may also be used to obtain other related results—e.g. to show that spurious local minima of the cross-validation function are more likely to occur at too small values of the bandwidth, rather than at too large values.

笔记与分组