跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接分析线性随机差分方程、时间序列多期预测及不同预测期下的均方误差最优规则,支持时间序列与预测方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Gregory C. Chow

基于贝叶斯方法的随机差分方程多期预测

研究问题
在线性随机差分方程系统中,如何利用有限样本信息与参数先验生成多期预测,并在均方误差标准下选择适合不同预测期的规则?
方法与思路
作者在贝叶斯框架下,给定观测、适当初始条件与可能弥散的参数先验,推导均方误差最小的多期预测,并讨论不同预测期的规则。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,一阶单变量系统可得到完全解析解,一般高阶多变量系统在k≤5时也可解析求解,并指出小样本下同一组参数估计未必适合各预测期。
阅读关注点
核对多期预测的损失函数、参数不确定性的处理、弥散先验下预测量是否存在,以及解析解对系统阶数与预测期的限制。
阅读边界
最优性依赖指定模型、先验与均方误差准则;摘要未报告先验敏感性或样本外表现,也未说明一般高阶多变量系统在k>5时的解法。

原文摘要

Given n observations on a system of linear stochastic difference equations with appropriate initial conditions, and given a prior density (possibly diffuse) of its parameters, this paper obtains the predictor of the time series k periods into the future with minimum mean squared error. Completely analytical solution is given for predictions from the first-order univariate system, and, in the general higher-order multivariate case, for k up to 5. econometric equations to produce forecasts were not designed for the purpose of forecasting. In this paper, it is argued that these estimation methods may be inadequate if the resulting estimates are to be used to make ex ante predictions for more than one period ahead, and if the accuracy of the predictions is measured, as it usually is, by the mean squared errors. A formulation of the multiperiod prediction problem is presented. It will then become clear that the same set of parameter estimates cannot be optimal in making predictions for different time periods into the future, when optimality is defined by minimum mean squared errors in small samples. Recently there has been much interest in comparing different econometric models, or different versions of the same econometric model obtained by applying different estimation techniques, in terms of how well they would have forecasted the dependent variables during the sample period, given the true values of the exogenous variables and given the values of the dependent variables lagged one or more periods. It has now become clear that, as judged by ex post forecasting for the sample period, models or techniques that perform better for one-period predictions may do worse for multiperiod predictions. For example, purely auto- regressive models could do better than models based on structural equations in ex post forecasting for one quarter ahead, but were worse in forecasting three or four quarters ahead, as documented in Hickman (4). Klein (9) and Fair (3) have compared multiperiod predictions of the sample data by different estimation techniques applied to the same econometric model. A related, though different, question naturally arises as to whether different parameter estimators should be used to produce ex ante forecasts for different periods into the future. The former topic is one of fitting equations to a set of data. The latter topic is one of statistical decision, and is the subject of this paper.'

笔记与分组