跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究网络的社区结构、节点度数异质性和社区检测一致性,对应网络方向,但未涉及因果干扰效应。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yunpeng Zhao
Elizaveta Levina
Ji Zhu

度数修正随机区块模型下网络社区检测的一致性

研究问题
当同一社区内节点度数差异较大时,哪些社区检测准则在标准或度数修正随机区块模型下保持一致,修正的实际收益何时明显?
方法与思路
作者建立度数修正模型下检验社区检测一致性的一般理论,比较多个准则,并用模拟网络和政治博客网络考察实际表现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,度数修正方法在更广模型类下一致;模块度类方法还需参数约束,似然方法无需此类约束,但度数修正增加估计负担。
阅读关注点
应核对一致性的定义、网络稀疏程度与社区规模条件、模块度的参数约束,以及节点度数异质性与有限样本表现之间的关系。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明。摘要未列出一般模型条件;似然方法无需所述参数约束,不代表完全无条件一致或适用于干扰效应识别。

原文摘要

Community detection is a fundamental problem in network analysis, with applications in many diverse areas. The stochastic block model is a common tool for model-based community detection, and asymptotic tools for checking consistency of community detection under the block model have been recently developed. However, the block model is limited by its assumption that all nodes within a community are stochastically equivalent, and provides a poor fit to networks with hubs or highly varying node degrees within communities, which are common in practice. The degree-corrected stochastic block model was proposed to address this shortcoming and allows variation in node degrees within a community while preserving the overall block community structure. In this paper we establish general theory for checking consistency of community detection under the degree-corrected stochastic block model and compare several community detection criteria under both the standard and the degree-corrected models. We show which criteria are consistent under which models and constraints, as well as compare their relative performance in practice. We find that methods based on the degree-corrected block model, which includes the standard block model as a special case, are consistent under a wider class of models and that modularity-type methods require parameter constraints for consistency, whereas likelihood-based methods do not. On the other hand, in practice, the degree correction involves estimating many more parameters, and empirically we find it is only worth doing if the node degrees within communities are indeed highly variable. We illustrate the methods on simulated networks and on a network of political blogs.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文