Design stability in adaptive experiments: implications for treatment effect estimation
自适应实验的设计稳定性及其对处理效应估计的影响AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究自适应随机实验中的平均处理效应估计及潜在结果推断。
自适应实验的设计稳定性及其对处理效应估计的影响AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Abstract We study the problem of estimating the average treatment effect under sequentially adaptive treatment assignment mechanisms. In contrast to classical completely randomized designs, the setting we consider is one in which the probability of assigning treatment to each experimental unit may depend on prior assignments and observed outcomes. Within the potential outcomes framework (Neyman, 1923), we propose and analyse two natural estimators for the average treatment effect: the inverse propensity weighted estimator and an augmented inverse propensity weighted estimator. The cornerstone of our analysis is the concept of design stability, which requires that as the number of units grows, either the assignment probabilities converge, or sample averages of the inverse propensity scores and of the inverse complement propensity scores converge in probability to fixed, nonrandom limits. Our main results establish central limit theorems for both estimators under design stability and provide explicit expressions for their asymptotic variances. We further propose estimators for these variances, enabling the construction of asymptotically valid confidence intervals. Finally, we illustrate our theoretical results in the context of Wei’s adaptive coin design (Wei, 1978) and Efron’s biased coin design (Efron, 1971), highlighting the applicability of our results to sequential experimental designs with adaptive randomization.