跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究自适应随机实验中的平均处理效应估计及潜在结果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Saikat Sengupta
Koulik Khamaru
Suvrojit Ghosh

自适应实验的设计稳定性及其对处理效应估计的影响

研究问题
当处理分配概率依赖此前分配和已观察结果时,如何估计平均处理效应,并为序贯自适应实验构造有效区间?
方法与思路
作者在潜在结果框架下分析逆倾向加权及其增广估计量,以分配概率或逆倾向相关样本均值的收敛定义设计稳定性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,设计稳定性下两类估计量满足中心极限定理,并给出渐近方差与其估计方法,支持渐近有效置信区间。
阅读关注点
应核对设计稳定性的两种条件、分配概率的限制、增广项的估计要求,以及自适应硬币设计如何满足理论条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断任意自适应设计是否适用,也不能据此声称小样本区间具有精确覆盖。

原文摘要

Abstract We study the problem of estimating the average treatment effect under sequentially adaptive treatment assignment mechanisms. In contrast to classical completely randomized designs, the setting we consider is one in which the probability of assigning treatment to each experimental unit may depend on prior assignments and observed outcomes. Within the potential outcomes framework (Neyman, 1923), we propose and analyse two natural estimators for the average treatment effect: the inverse propensity weighted estimator and an augmented inverse propensity weighted estimator. The cornerstone of our analysis is the concept of design stability, which requires that as the number of units grows, either the assignment probabilities converge, or sample averages of the inverse propensity scores and of the inverse complement propensity scores converge in probability to fixed, nonrandom limits. Our main results establish central limit theorems for both estimators under design stability and provide explicit expressions for their asymptotic variances. We further propose estimators for these variances, enabling the construction of asymptotically valid confidence intervals. Finally, we illustrate our theoretical results in the context of Wei’s adaptive coin design (Wei, 1978) and Efron’s biased coin design (Efron, 1971), highlighting the applicability of our results to sequential experimental designs with adaptive randomization.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文