跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及多元回归与充分降维,但没有明确因子模型、结构估计或经济预测目标,所列领域证据不足。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kshitij Khare
Subhadip Pal
Zhihua Su

包络模型的贝叶斯方法

研究问题
在多元线性回归的包络模型中,如何建立尊重子空间几何结构的贝叶斯估计、模型选择与不确定性分析框架?
方法与思路
作者以矩阵Bingham分布为包络子空间的正交基矩阵设定先验,利用分块Gibbs采样进行后验计算与模型选择。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称框架能纳入子空间先验信息,处理样本量小于响应维数的情形,并借助后验分布刻画不确定性。
阅读关注点
应核对子空间及维数的先验设定、模型选择准则、Gibbs采样表现,以及小样本高响应维数下可用性的具体条件。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要;效率增益属于潜力陈述,先验敏感性和计算表现未量化,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

The envelope model is a new paradigm to address estimation and prediction in multivariate analysis. Using sufficient dimension reduction techniques, it has the potential to achieve substantial efficiency gains compared to standard models. This model was first introduced by [Statist. Sinica 20 (2010) 927–960] for multivariate linear regression, and has since been adapted to many other contexts. However, a Bayesian approach for analyzing envelope models has not yet been investigated in the literature. In this paper, we develop a comprehensive Bayesian framework for estimation and model selection in envelope models in the context of multivariate linear regression. Our framework has the following attractive features. First, we use the matrix Bingham distribution to construct a prior on the orthogonal basis matrix of the envelope subspace. This prior respects the manifold structure of the envelope model, and can directly incorporate prior information about the envelope subspace through the specification of hyperparamaters. This feature has potential applications in the broader Bayesian sufficient dimension reduction area. Second, sampling from the resulting posterior distribution can be achieved by using a block Gibbs sampler with standard associated conditionals. This in turn facilitates computationally efficient estimation and model selection. Third, unlike the current frequentist approach, our approach can accommodate situations where the sample size is smaller than the number of responses. Lastly, the Bayesian approach inherently offers comprehensive uncertainty characterization through the posterior distribution. We illustrate the utility of our approach on simulated and real datasets.

笔记与分组