跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本聚焦微生物测序整合与差异丰度检验,没有所列计量经济学细分方向的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

Integrative Analysis of Microbial 16S Gene and Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing Data Improves Statistical Efficiency in Testing Differential Abundance

整合微生物 16S 与宏基因组测序数据以提高差异丰度检验效率

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ye Yue
Yicong Mao
Timothy D. Read
Veronika Fedirko
Glen A. Satten
Xuan Chen
Xiang Zhan
Yi-Juan Hu

整合微生物 16S 与宏基因组测序数据以提高差异丰度检验效率

研究问题
如何整合同一研究中两类微生物测序数据,在实验偏差不同、样本部分重叠和测序量不均衡的情况下,提高菌属及群落层面的差异丰度检验效率?
方法与思路
作者提出 Com-2seq,将 16S 标记基因与宏基因组测序数据联合用于菌属及群落层面的检验,并处理两种实验之间的数据差异。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,模拟中联合方法较单一数据分析及两种临时整合方案更有效率,真实数据中发现若干单独分析遗漏的糖尿病前期相关菌属。
阅读关注点
应核对实验偏差和部分样本重叠如何进入模型,菌属与群落检验如何校准,以及效率提升是否同时保持检验水平和多重比较控制。
阅读边界
依据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明。摘要未提供模型条件、检验校准细节及提升数值,所述菌属关联不等同于因果关系。

原文摘要

The most widely used technologies for profiling microbial communities are 16S marker-gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Surprisingly, many microbiome studies have performed both experiments on the same cohort of samples. The two sequencing datasets often reveal consistent patterns of microbial signatures, suggesting that an integrative analysis of both datasets could enhance the testing power for these signatures. However, differential experimental biases, partially overlapping samples, and uneven library sizes pose tremendous challenges when combining the two datasets. In this article, we introduce the first method of this kind, named Com-2seq, that combines the two datasets for testing differential abundance at the genus level as well as the community level while overcoming these difficulties. Our simulation studies demonstrate that Com-2seq substantially enhances statistical efficiency over analysis of a single dataset and outperforms two ad hoc approaches to integrative analysis. In analysis of real microbiome data, Com-2seq uncovered scientifically plausible findings, namely, the association of Butyrivibrio, Gemella and Ignavigranum with prediabetes status, which would have been missed by analyzing a single dataset. Butyrivibrio failed to reach the significance level in the analysis of each dataset despite showing a consistent trend; Gemella and Ignavigranum failed to produce adequate data in the 16S experiment. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文