跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究时域和频域时间序列拟合优度检验;提及尾指数并不足以归入金融风险。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Willa W. Chen
Rohit S. Deo

改善正态近似的幂变换及其应用

研究问题
对有限样本中明显右偏、但可能渐近正态的统计量,如何选择幂变换改善正态近似,并改善时间序列拟合优度检验的表现?
方法与思路
作者针对独立正随机变量的正线性组合提出幂变换选择方法,并对两类时间序列检验结合有限样本均值和方差修正。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法包含经典立方根变换,修正后的时间序列检验具有更好的尺寸表现,并在所考察情形中改善功效。
阅读关注点
应核对变换选择依据、矩条件及均值方差修正方式,并检查尺寸和功效比较采用的样本量、备择情形与基准检验。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;具体变换、比较设定和数值结果未展开,不能推广为所有统计量或备择下都改善功效,也不能推断版本变化。

原文摘要

Summary Random variables which are positive linear combinations of positive independent random variables can have heavily right-skewed finite sample distributions even though they might be asymptotically normally distributed. We provide a simple method of determining an appropriate power transformation to improve the normal approximation in small samples. Our method contains the Wilson–Hilferty cube root transformation for χ2 random variables as a special case. We also provide some important examples, including test statistics of goodness-of-fit and tail index estimators, where such power transformations can be applied. In particular, we study the small sample behaviour of two goodness-of-fit tests for time series models which have been proposed recently in the literature. Both tests are generalizations of the popular Box–Ljung–Pierce portmanteau test, one in the time domain and the other in the frequency domain. A power transformation with a finite sample mean and variance correction is proposed, which ameliorates the small sample effect. It is found that the corrected versions of the tests have markedly better size properties. The correction is also found to result in an overall increase in power which can be significant under certain alternatives. Furthermore, the corrected tests also have better power than the Box–Ljung–Pierce portmanteau test, unlike the uncorrected versions.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文