跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本研究粗化年龄的缺失信息处理与模型敏感性,未明确因果、面板、选择或分布效应等所列目标。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Daniel F. Heitjan
Donald B. Rubin

通过多重插补对粗化数据推断:年龄堆积的应用

研究问题
年龄记录在特定数值堆积时,如何利用多重插补进行推断,并判断结果对真实年龄模型和取整过程假设有多敏感?
方法与思路
作者为坦桑尼亚儿童粗化年龄建立简单与复杂插补模型,纳入性别和人体测量信息,比较不同取整、截断及区间宽度设定。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称推断对取整与截断机制十分敏感,而诊断难以区分这些机制;复杂模型更获诊断支持,却可能产生与简单模型相似的推断。
阅读关注点
应核对粗化过程与先验设定、插补不确定性的合并方式,以及诊断能检验什么、不能区分什么和区间宽度的信息来源。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,版本未注明。有效推断依赖所设插补与粗化模型,诊断支持不能证明机制正确;不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Multiple imputation is applied to a demographic data set with coarse age measurements for Tanzanian children. The heaped ages are multiply imputed with plausible true ages using (a) a simple naive model and (b) a new, relatively complex model that relates true age to the observed values of heaped age, sex, and anthropometric variables. The imputed true ages are used to create valid inferences under the models and compare inferences across models, thereby revealing sensitivity of inferences to prior specifications, from naive to complex. In addition, diagnostic analyses applied to the imputed data are used to suggest which models appear most appropriate. Because it is not clear just what set of heaping intervals should be used, the models are applied under various assumptions about the heaping: rounding (to the nearest year or half year) versus a combination of rounding and truncation as practiced in the United States, and medium versus wide heaping interval sizes. The most striking conclusions are the following: (a) inferences are very sensitive to the assumption of strict rounding versus rounding combined with truncation, yet judging from the diagnostics, the data cannot distinguish between such models; and (b) the diagnostics consistently favor the new, more complex model, which, although theoretically more satisfactory, can lead to inferences very similar to those obtained with the naive model. It is concluded that knowledge of the interval widths and heaping process sharpens valid inferences from data of this kind, and that given a specified process, simple and easily programmed multiple-imputation methods can lead to valid inferences.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文