跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般多重检验中的密度与比例估计,没有经济分布效应或其他所列领域的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
T. Tony Cai
Jiashun Jin

大规模多重检验中零假设密度与非零效应比例估计的最优收敛速率

研究问题
在大规模多重检验中,零假设密度与非零效应比例估计的极小极大收敛速率是什么,如何构造达到该速率的估计量?
方法与思路
作者通过构造低频特征函数匹配的最不利密度进行两点检验以给出下界,并用经验特征函数与傅里叶分析构造上界估计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称得到极小极大上下界及速率最优估计量;数值比较显示估计更精确,嵌入部分控制错误发现率的程序后结果也更准确。
阅读关注点
应核对混合模型及参数空间、最不利密度构造、频率选择,并区分估计误差改善与错误发现率控制保证。
阅读边界
仅据稿件版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要;参数空间、速率及数值结果未提供,不能据此断言任意多重检验都得到改善。

原文摘要

An important estimation problem that is closely related to large-scale multiple testing is that of estimating the null density and the proportion of nonnull effects. A few estimators have been introduced in the literature; however, several important problems, including the evaluation of the minimax rate of convergence and the construction of rate-optimal estimators, remain open. In this paper, we consider optimal estimation of the null density and the proportion of nonnull effects. Both minimax lower and upper bounds are derived. The lower bound is established by a two-point testing argument, where at the core is the novel construction of two least favorable marginal densities f1 and f2. The density f1 is heavy tailed both in the spatial and frequency domains and f2 is a perturbation of f1 such that the characteristic functions associated with f1 and f2 match each other in low frequencies. The minimax upper bound is obtained by constructing estimators which rely on the empirical characteristic function and Fourier analysis. The estimator is shown to be minimax rate optimal. Compared to existing methods in the literature, the proposed procedure not only provides more precise estimates of the null density and the proportion of the nonnull effects, but also yields more accurate results when used inside some multiple testing procedures which aim at controlling the False Discovery Rate (FDR). The procedure is easy to implement and numerical results are given.

笔记与分组