Automatically Differentiable Random Coefficient Logistic Demand Estimation
可自动微分的随机系数 Logit 需求估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究随机系数 Logit 需求模型的矩条件、结构参数估计与计算实现。
可自动微分的随机系数 Logit 需求估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We show how the random coefficient logistic demand (BLP) model can be phrased as an automatically differentiable moment function, including the incorporation of numerical safeguards proposed in the literature. This allows gradient-based frequentist and quasi-Bayesian estimation using the Continuously Updating Estimator (CUE). Drawing from the machine learning literature, we outline hitherto under-utilized best practices in both frequentist and Bayesian estimation techniques. Our Monte Carlo experiments compare the performance of CUE, 2S-GMM, and LTE estimation. Preliminary findings indicate that the CUE estimated using LTE and frequentist optimization has a lower bias but higher MAE compared to the traditional 2-Stage GMM (2S-GMM) approach. We also find that using credible intervals from MCMC sampling for the non-linear parameters together with frequentist analytical standard errors for the concentrated out linear parameters provides empirical coverage closest to the nominal level. The accompanying admest Python package provides a platform for replication and extensibility.