跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦医学事件时间测量误差及风险预测,未提供与所列因果、宏观或金融细分方向直接对应的证据。

反馈分类问题

Nonparametric Adjustment for Measurement Error in Time-to-Event Data: Application to Risk Prediction Models

事件发生时间测量误差的非参数校正:风险预测模型应用

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Danielle Braun
Malka Gorfine
Hormuzd A. Katki
Argyrios Ziogas

事件发生时间测量误差的非参数校正:风险预测模型应用

研究问题
当风险预测模型使用存在误报的事件发生时间作为预测变量时,如何利用验证数据修正预测偏差并改善校准?
方法与思路
作者以非参数平滑 Kaplan–Meier 估计量拟合测量误差过程,再通过蒙特卡洛积分将误差校正纳入风险预测。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称模拟与乳腺癌家族史应用中的校正主要改善预测校准和总体准确性,实际应用的改善尤其出现在低风险分组。
阅读关注点
应核对验证数据对误差过程的识别作用、跨样本应用条件、删失的处理,以及预测误差、区分度与校准指标的分别表现。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未说明验证样本可迁移条件与具体改善幅度,医学风险不能归为金融风险。

原文摘要

Mismeasured time to event data used as a predictor in risk prediction models will lead to inaccurate predictions. This arises in the context of self-reported family history, a time to event predictor often measured with error, used in Mendelian risk prediction models. Using validation data, we propose a method to adjust for this type of error. We estimate the measurement error process using a nonparametric smoothed Kaplan-Meier estimator, and use Monte Carlo integration to implement the adjustment. We apply our method to simulated data in the context of both Mendelian and multivariate survival prediction models. Simulations are evaluated using measures of mean squared error of prediction (MSEP), area under the response operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC), and the ratio of observed to expected number of events. These results show that our method mitigates the effects of measurement error mainly by improving calibration and total accuracy. We illustrate our method in the context of Mendelian risk prediction models focusing on misreporting of breast cancer, fitting the measurement error model on data from the University of California at Irvine, and applying our method to counselees from the Cancer Genetics Network. We show that our method improves overall calibration, especially in low risk deciles.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文