跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论随机试验中的平均处理效应和图结构社会溢出,对应因果推断与网络干扰。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Tassilo Schwarz

影响下的随机对照试验:协变量因素与图网络干扰

研究问题
研究随机对照试验如何兼顾已知协变量下的处理分配和参与者之间的社会溢出,并控制效应估计的偏差与方差。
方法与思路
作者回顾具有最坏情形方差界的分配算法,构建参与者影响的图模型,并设计平均处理效应估计量及方差优化问题。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,分析了网络效应估计量的偏差和方差,将方差最小化归结为矩阵向量乘积范数优化,并讨论图中不连通分量。
阅读关注点
应核对网络影响如何进入潜在结果、目标效应的定义、处理分配机制,以及方差优化与不连通分量分析的适用条件。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未经核实;摘要未说明网络是否已知、估计量无偏条件及优化方法的实际效果。

原文摘要

Randomized controlled trials are not only the golden standard in medicine and vaccine trials but have spread to many other disciplines like behavioral economics, making it an important interdisciplinary tool for scientists. When designing randomized controlled trials, how to assign participants to treatments becomes a key issue. In particular in the presence of covariate factors, the assignment can significantly influence statistical properties and thereby the quality of the trial. Another key issue is the widely popular assumption among experimenters that participants do not influence each other -- which is far from reality in a field study and can, if unaccounted for, deteriorate the quality of the trial. We address both issues in our work. After introducing randomized controlled trials bridging terms from different disciplines, we first address the issue of participant-treatment assignment in the presence of known covariate factors. Thereby, we review a recent assignment algorithm that achieves good worst-case variance bounds. Second, we address social spillover effects. Therefore, we build a comprehensive graph-based model of influence between participants, for which we design our own average treatment effect estimator $\hat τ_{net}$. We discuss its bias and variance and reduce the problem of variance minimization to a certain instance of minimizing the norm of a matrix-vector product, which has been considered in literature before. Further, we discuss the role of disconnected components in the model's underlying graph.

笔记与分组