False Discovery Rate Control via Data Splitting
通过数据拆分控制错误发现率AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用回归特征筛选与多重检验,未给出因果目标、面板结构或所列经济金融领域的直接文本依据。
通过数据拆分控制错误发现率AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Selecting relevant features associated with a given response variable is an important problem in many scientific fields. Quantifying quality and uncertainty of a selection result via false discovery rate (FDR) control has been of recent interest. This article introduces a data-splitting method (referred to as “DS”) to asymptotically control the FDR while maintaining a high power. For each feature, DS constructs a test statistic by estimating two independent regression coefficients via data splitting. FDR control is achieved by taking advantage of the statistic’s property that, for any null feature, its sampling distribution is symmetric about zero; whereas for a relevant feature, its sampling distribution has a positive mean. Furthermore, a Multiple Data Splitting (MDS) method is proposed to stabilize the selection result and boost the power. Surprisingly, with the FDR under control, MDS not only helps overcome the power loss caused by data splitting, but also results in a lower variance of the false discovery proportion (FDP) compared with all other methods in consideration. Extensive simulation studies and a real-data application show that the proposed methods are robust to the unknown distribution of features, easy to implement and computationally efficient, and are often the most powerful ones among competitors especially when the signals are weak and correlations or partial correlations among features are high. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.