Characterizing Survivor Principal Strata Over Time: Identification, Efficient Estimation, and Sensitivity Analysis
随时间刻画幸存者主层:识别、有效估计与敏感性分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心为主分层、幸存者平均因果效应、识别与有效估计及敏感性分析,属于因果推断方向。
随时间刻画幸存者主层:识别、有效估计与敏感性分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Longitudinal studies with functional outcomes subject to truncation-by-death frequently report time-indexed survivor average causal effect estimates, defined among individuals who would survive regardless of treatment assignment. Because the survivor stratum can change over time, the resulting effect estimates may pertain to populations with different characteristics. We propose accompanying survivor average causal effect estimates with measures of covariate divergence between the survivor and baseline populations. We study standardized mean differences (SMDs) and the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence as moment-based and distributional summaries, respectively. We show that these divergence measures are identified under a subset of standard principal stratification assumptions and that their identification involves nuisance functions already estimated in survivor analyses. We derive the efficient influence functions, enabling construction of one-step bias-corrected estimators with appealing large-sample properties and allowing machine learning for nuisance estimation. We demonstrate that in randomized studies, one-step estimation of SMDs is robust to arbitrary nuisance model misspecification, whereas the KL divergence and broader density ratio estimands are more sensitive to nuisance misspecification. Additionally, we provide a sensitivity analysis framework that partially relaxes a monotonicity assumption required for identification, and construct one-step estimators for the resulting bounds. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate the finite-sample performance of the proposed estimators and illustrate how divergence measures can improve the interpretability of survivor analyses. Finally, we assess covariate divergence in survivor strata over time in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) trials, using data from the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials database.
依赖处理自然历史的修正处理政策
Longitudinal modified treatment policies (LMTP) are a class of interventions that allow the definition, identification, and estimation of causal effects in general settings, such as with continuous or multivariate exposures, treatment regimens that require grace periods. Targeted machine learning estimators (i.e., double/debiased) have been formulated for LMTPs that assign the exposure at time $t$ as a function of the natural value of treatment at time $t$. However,…
一般工具变量下因果效应的识别与去偏学习
Instrumental variable methods are fundamental to causal inference when treatment assignment is confounded by unobserved variables. In this article, we develop a general nonparametric causal framework for identification and learning with multi-categorical or continuous instrumental variables. Specifically, the mean potential outcomes and the average treatment effect can be identified via a regular weighting function derived from the proposed framework. Leveraging…
半参数三重差分估计量
The triple difference causal inference framework is an extension of the well-known difference-in-differences framework. It relaxes the parallel trends assumption of the difference-in-differences framework through leveraging data from an auxiliary domain. Despite being commonly applied in empirical research, the triple difference framework has received relatively limited attention in the statistics literature. Specifically, investigating the intricacies of identification and…
去偏且具有半参数效率的变化中变化估计量
We present a novel extension of the influential changes-in-changes (CiC) framework of Athey and Imbens (2006) for estimating the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) and distributional causal effects in panel data with unmeasured confounding. While CiC relaxes the parallel trends assumption in difference-in-differences (DiD), existing methods typically assume a scalar unobserved confounder and monotonic outcome relationships, and lack inference tools that…
密集纵向数据的动态因果中介分析
Intensive longitudinal data, characterized by frequent measurements across numerous time points, are increasingly common due to advances in wearable devices and mobile health technologies. We consider evaluating causal mediation pathways between time-varying exposures, time-varying mediators, and a final, distal outcome using such data. Addressing mediation questions in these settings is challenging due to numerous potential exposures, complex mediation pathways, and…
用于政策学习的半参数工具变量双重差分方法
Summary Recently, there has been a surge in methodological development for the difference-in-differences approach to evaluate causal effects. Standard methods in the literature rely on the parallel-trend assumption to identify the average treatment effect on the treated. However, the parallel-trend assumption may be violated in the presence of unmeasured confounding, and the average treatment effect on the treated may not be useful in learning a treatment assignment policy…