跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦高维变量选择与错误发现率控制,未指向所列因果、因子或收益预测等专门方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Asaf Weinstein
Weijie J. Su
Małgorzata Bogdan
Rina Foygel Barber

使用 ℓp 正则化统计量的 Model-X knockoffs 功效分析

研究问题
在高维线性回归中,按正则化系数排序并用 Model-X knockoffs 控制错误发现率时,变量选择功效如何刻画?
方法与思路
作者扩展近似消息传递理论以处理原变量与 knockoffs 的配对,推导渐近功效,并比较 Lasso、阈值化 Lasso 和调参方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,得到精确渐近功效预测;在所考察的独立同分布协变量设定下,增广设计上的交叉验证调参接近最优,并分析符号错误。
阅读关注点
应核对协变量与信号的渐近设定、knockoffs 的构造、功效及符号错误的定义,以及交叉验证接近最优所依据的比较范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;结论限于文中所考察的设定,摘要未说明相关协变量或有限样本中的适用性。

原文摘要

Variable selection properties of procedures utilizing penalized-likelihood estimates is a central topic in the study of high-dimensional linear regression problems. Existing literature emphasizes the quality of ranking of the variables by such procedures as reflected in the receiver operating characteristic curve or in prediction performance. Specifically, recent works have harnessed modern theory of approximate message-passing (AMP) to obtain, in a particular setting, exact asymptotic predictions of the type I, type II error tradeoff for selection procedures that rely on ℓp-regularized estimators. In practice, effective ranking by itself is often not sufficient because some calibration for Type I error is required. In this work, we study theoretically the power of selection procedures that similarly rank the features by the size of an ℓp-regularized estimator, but further use Model-X knockoffs to control the false discovery rate in the realistic situation where no prior information about the signal is available. In analyzing the power of the resulting procedure, we extend existing results in AMP theory to handle the pairing between original variables and their knockoffs. This is used to derive exact asymptotic predictions for power. We apply the general results to compare the power of the knockoffs versions of Lasso and thresholded-Lasso selection, and demonstrate that in the i.i.d. covariate setting under consideration, tuning by cross-validation on the augmented design matrix is nearly optimal. We further demonstrate how the techniques allow to analyze also the Type S error, and a corresponding notion of power, when selections are supplemented with a decision on the sign of the coefficient.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文