跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论因果图忠实性、条件独立检验及 PC、FCI 因果发现算法,因此归入因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Philip Boeken
Patrick Forré
Joris M. Mooij

贝叶斯网络通常满足忠实性吗?

研究问题
因果发现中常用的忠实性假设,在一般贝叶斯网络及受限模型类中是否具有拓扑或测度意义上的典型性?
方法与思路
作者分别研究总变差与弱拓扑中的忠实分布集合,分析条件指数族、受限非参数密度及含潜变量网络,并联系条件独立检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在所述模型类和正则条件下获得开放稠密性或零测度结果,并据此论证 PC、FCI 等算法在典型集合上的一致性。
阅读关注点
应核对不同模型类使用的拓扑、正则条件和潜投影定义,并区分开放稠密、几乎处处与算法一致性各自的含义。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及接收状态未核实;典型性不等于有限样本可靠性,摘要也未说明接近不忠实分布时的检验表现。

原文摘要

Faithfulness is a common assumption in causal inference, often motivated by the fact that the faithful parameters of linear Gaussian and discrete Bayesian networks are typical, and the folklore belief that this should also hold for other classes of Bayesian networks. We address this open question by showing that among all Bayesian networks over a given DAG, the faithful Bayesian networks are indeed `typical': they constitute a dense, open set with respect to the total variation metric. This does not directly imply that faithfulness is typical in restricted classes of Bayesian networks that are often considered in statistical applications. To this end we consider the class of Bayesian networks parametrised by conditional exponential families, for which we show that under regularity conditions, the faithful parameters constitute a dense and open set, the unfaithful parameters have Lebesgue measure zero, and the induced faithful distributions are open and dense in the weak topology. This extends the existing results for linear Gaussian and discrete Bayesian networks. We also show for nonparametric classes of Bayesian networks with uniformly equicontinuous and uniformly bounded conditional densities that the faithful Bayesian networks are open and dense in the weak topology. All these results also hold for Bayesian networks with latent variables, if faithfulness is only required to hold with respect to the latent projection. Finally, for the considered conditional exponential family parametrisations and nonparametric conditional density models, the topological properties of conditional independence imply the existence of a consistent conditional independence test. Together with the topological properties of faithfulness, this implies that sound constraint-based causal discovery algorithms like PC and FCI are consistent on an open and dense -- and hence `typical' -- set of Bayesian networks.

笔记与分组