跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究异方差时间序列、汇率波动及自适应预测区间。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ruey S. Tsay

条件异方差时间序列模型

研究问题
如何统一描述依赖过去观测或创新的时变条件方差,并扩展 RCA 与 ARCH 模型以处理异常值和自适应预测区间?
方法与思路
作者将常系数 ARMA 与纯随机系数传递函数结合,构造包含 RCA 和 ARCH 的模型类,并用信息准则选择传递函数阶数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新模型还允许条件方差依赖条件期望的平方,并以异常值处理和英镑周度即期汇率展示自适应预测区间。
阅读关注点
应核对一般模型包含 RCA 和 ARCH 的具体方式、模型性质所需条件、阶数选择模拟,以及预测区间的覆盖表现。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;未给出模型性质的具体条件或预测性能数值。

原文摘要

Under the traditional linear time series or regression setting, the conditional variance of one-step-ahead prediction is time invariant. Experience in conjunction with data analysis, however, suggests that the variability of a process might well depend on the available information. This reality has motivated extensive research to relax the constant variance assumption imposed by the traditional linear time series model, and several classes of generalized parametric models designed specifically for handling nonhomogeneity of a process have been proposed recently. In particular, the random coefficient autoregressive (RCA) models were widely investigated by time series analysts and the autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (ARCH) models were investigated by econometricians. The interesting fact is that the ARCH processes can be regarded as special cases of the RCA model. In this article, I first give the relationship between these two types of models and show that the special feature of these two models is the varying conditional variance. This feature is presented in two ways from which the two models differ. The RCA models allow for the conditional variance to evolve with previous observations, whereas the ARCH models make use of previous innovations. This recognition immediately points out that to describe the varying conditional variance the RCA and ARCH models may not be parsimonious in parameterization and further extension is needed. The second goal of this article is, therefore, to propose a general class of conditional heteroscedastic time series models, each of which consists of a constant coefficient autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model and a purely random coefficient transfer function model. Both the RCA and the ARCH models become special cases of this general model. In addition, the proposed model also allows for the conditional variance to be a function of the square of the conditional expectation. The use of a purely random coefficient transfer function model to describe the varying conditional variance is based on the fact that the relationship between the conditional variance and available information must be unidirectional. Properties of the proposed general models are discussed, and a model specification procedure is suggested. The information criterion approach is adopted to specify the order of the transfer function equation, and simulation is used to illustrate the performance of the criteria, for example, Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Finally, two applications of the proposed model are considered. The first application uses the model as an alternative for handling outliers in time series analysis. An apparent advantage here is that the model does not require identification of the outliers, for example, location, type, and number of outliers. Series C of Box and Jenkins (1976) provides a good example. The second application of the proposed model is to refine the traditional ARMA technique so that volatility of a series can be adequately addressed. An advantage here is the ability to provide adaptive forecasting intervals. The weekly spot rate of the British pound provides a clear illustration. This example also gives justifications for the model generalization considered in the article.

笔记与分组