Information criteria for variable selection under sparsity
稀疏情形下用于变量选择的信息准则AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及通用高维变量选择与风险评价,未指向所列具体应用领域。
稀疏情形下用于变量选择的信息准则AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The optimization of an information criterion in a variable selection procedure leads to an additional bias, which can be substantial for sparse, high-dimensional data. One can compensate for the bias by applying shrinkage while estimating within the selected models. This paper presents modified information criteria for use in variable selection and estimation without shrinkage. The analysis motivating the modified criteria follows two routes. The first, which we explore for signal-plus-noise observations only, proceeds by comparing estimators with and without shrinkage. The second, discussed for general regression models, describes the optimization or selection bias as a double-sided effect, which we call a mirror effect: among the numerous insignificant variables, those with large, noisy values appear more valuable than an arbitrary variable, while in fact they carry more noise than an arbitrary variable. The mirror effect is investigated for Akaike’s information criterion and for Mallows’ Cp, with special attention paid to the latter criterion as a stopping rule in a least-angle regression routine. The result is a new stopping rule, which focuses not on the quality of a lasso shrinkage selection but on the least-squares estimator without shrinkage within the same selection.