跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以多对象中的首选结果建模潜在偏好,明确涉及离散选择及其排序推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jianqing Fan
Zhipeng Lou
Weichen Wang
Mengxin Yu

基于多项比较首选结果的排序推断

研究问题
每次多项比较仅观察首选对象时,如何估计潜在偏好分数,并同时量化分数差异与各对象排名的不确定性?
方法与思路
作者在均匀抽样的首选Plackett–Luce模型中研究最大似然估计,以最大成对差异统计量和高斯乘子bootstrap构造同时区间。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,建立分数估计的两类范数收敛速率与渐近正态性,并提出分数差及排名的同时推断框架,辅以模拟和应用。
阅读关注点
核对抽样概率、重复比较次数与对象数之间的条件,排名区间的构造,以及bootstrap有效性和分数归一化要求。
阅读边界
依据arXiv 2211.11957v3预印本摘要;不能据此声称已同行评审或期刊接收,也不能推断刊本变化;具体条件与应用结果未提供。

原文摘要

This paper considers ranking inference of $n$ items based on the observed data on the top choice among $M$ randomly selected items at each trial. This is a useful modification of the Plackett-Luce model for $M$-way ranking with only the top choice observed and is an extension of the celebrated Bradley-Terry-Luce model that corresponds to $M=2$. Under a uniform sampling scheme in which any $M$ distinguished items are selected for comparisons with probability $p$ and the selected $M$ items are compared $L$ times with multinomial outcomes, we establish the statistical rates of convergence for underlying $n$ preference scores using both $\ell_2$-norm and $\ell_\infty$-norm, with the minimum sampling complexity. In addition, we establish the asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator that allows us to construct confidence intervals for the underlying scores. Furthermore, we propose a novel inference framework for ranking items through a sophisticated maximum pairwise difference statistic whose distribution is estimated via a valid Gaussian multiplier bootstrap. The estimated distribution is then used to construct simultaneous confidence intervals for the differences in the preference scores and the ranks of individual items. They also enable us to address various inference questions on the ranks of these items. Extensive simulation studies lend further support to our theoretical results. A real data application illustrates the usefulness of the proposed methods convincingly.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文