跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般高维协方差估计,应用为声呐频谱,未提供金融因子、波动率或其他所列细分领域的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yumou Qiu
Song Xi Chen

高维协方差矩阵估计的带宽选择

研究问题
高维协方差矩阵的带状化与渐缩估计依赖带宽,如何依据估计误差选择带宽,并量化所选带宽与目标带宽的关系?
方法与思路
作者最小化估计误差矩阵平方 Frobenius 范数期望的经验估计,选择带状化带宽,并扩展到渐缩带宽与阈值化水平选择。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称证明了带宽选择的比值一致性,给出目标带宽落入估计值邻域区间的覆盖概率下界,并提供模拟与声呐数据案例。
阅读关注点
应核对风险经验估计的构造、比值一致性所需维度与协方差条件、覆盖概率下界,以及各扩展是否需要额外假设。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 摘要,带宽目标的精确定义、理论条件和数值表现未说明;高维协方差估计不能自动等同于金融应用。

原文摘要

Yumou Qiu & Song Xi ChenYumou Qiu is Assistant Professor, Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE 68583-0963 (E-mail: ). Song Xi Chen is Chair Professor, Department of Business Statistics and Econometrics, Guanghua School of Management and Center for Statistical Science, Peking University, Beijing 100651, China, and Professor, Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1210 (E-mail: ).We thank the editors, the AE and three anonymous referees for constructive comments and suggestions which have improved the presentation of the article. We also thank Feng Yi and Professor Hui Zou for sharing the code of their work. The research was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1309210 and National Natural Science Foundation of China key grant 11131002.Color versions of one or more of the figures in the article can be found online at www.tandfonline.com/r/jasa.The banding estimator of Bickel and Levina and its tapering version of Cai, Zhang, and Zhou are important high-dimensional covariance estimators. Both estimators require a bandwidth parameter. We propose a bandwidth selector for the banding estimator by minimizing an empirical estimate of the expected squared Frobenius norms of the estimation error matrix. The ratio consistency of the bandwidth selector is established. We provide a lower bound for the coverage probability of the underlying bandwidth being contained in an interval around the bandwidth estimate. Extensions to the bandwidth selection for the tapering estimator and threshold level selection for the thresholding covariance estimator are made. Numerical simulations and a case study on sonar spectrum data are conducted to demonstrate the proposed approaches. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文