跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确构造时间依赖治疗干预下的因果目标量,并使用 TMLE 估计。

反馈分类问题

Estimation of treatment effects in presence of differential use of post-randomization concomitant medication with time-to-event outcomes

随机化后伴随用药差异下的生存结局处理效应估计

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Edwin Fong
Jens M. Tarp
Thomas A. Gerds
Henrik Ravn

随机化后伴随用药差异下的生存结局处理效应估计

研究问题
安慰剂组随机化后更多使用伴随药物时,如何在生存结局研究中区分研究药物的作用与伴随治疗暴露差异的影响?
方法与思路
作者定义平衡两组伴随用药暴露的时间依赖干预目标量,采用缓解正值性问题的随机干预,并使用 TMLE 估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出补充意向治疗分析的因果目标量与估计方案,允许调整随访中的时间变化协变量,并用模拟和 LEADER 试验演示。
阅读关注点
应核对随机干预的具体定义、序贯混杂与删失条件、正值性改善的范围,以及目标量与临床药物效果的对应关系。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未核实;随机化不自动解决后续用药的混杂,摘要未列出完整识别条件。

原文摘要

In placebo-controlled randomized trials, the post-randomization use of concomitant medications may be higher in the placebo arm than in the treatment arm. This may dilute the full benefits of the randomized drug as estimated by the intention-to-treat analysis. We focus on cardiovascular outcomes trials in type-2 diabetes patients of glucose-lowering treatments where patients in the placebo arm are more likely to add other glucose-lowering agents with established cardio-protective properties. As a supplement to the intention-to-treat analysis, we propose a class of estimands within a causal framework that isolates the specific impact of the treatment being studied from that of concomitant treatment use. These estimands are defined under time-dependent treatment interventions to balance exposure to additional medications across intervention arms. We advocate for specific stochastic interventions to achieve this balance while minimizing positivity violations, which arise when certain treatment combinations or characteristics are not sufficiently represented in the data. We employ targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) to optimize the estimation procedure for our estimands while allowing for flexible adjustments for time-dependent covariates from follow-up visits. Finally, we demonstrate the application of the methods through a simulation study and a real-world example from the LEADER cardiovascular outcomes trial, which assessed cardiovascular risk for liraglutide versus placebo.

笔记与分组