跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以工具变量和孟德尔随机化识别连续暴露的非线性因果效应为核心。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Haodong Tian
Ashish Patel
Stephen Burgess

基于分层的非线性效应工具变量分析框架

研究问题
连续暴露存在未观测混杂时,如何利用工具变量估计非线性因果效应形状,并识别效应变化点或阈值,尤其面对弱工具?
方法与思路
作者提出基于分层的工具变量框架,以模拟比较效应函数和阈值估计,并使用英国生物样本库的遗传工具分析饮酒与收缩压。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在所考察模拟中,弱工具下效应形状预测优于代表性方法,并能估计变化点;应用报告饮酒存在与血压效应相关的阈值。
阅读关注点
核对分层规则与工具有效性条件、弱工具下的推断及阈值不确定性,检查孟德尔随机化应用的识别依据和模型敏感性。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审和期刊接收均未核实;摘要未给出识别假设、阈值数值或区间,与指南一致不能独立验证因果结论。

原文摘要

Nonlinear causal effects are prevalent in many research scenarios involving continuous exposures, and instrumental variables (IVs) can be employed to investigate such effects, particularly in the presence of unmeasured confounders. However, common IV methods for nonlinear effect analysis, such as IV regression or the control-function method, have inherent limitations, leading to either low statistical power or potentially misleading conclusions. In this work, we propose an alternative IV framework for nonlinear effect analysis, which has recently emerged in genetic epidemiology and addresses many of the drawbacks of existing IV methods. This framework enables study of the effect function while avoiding unnecessary model assumptions. In particular, it facilitates the identification of change points or threshold values in causal effects. Through a wide variety of simulations, we demonstrate that our framework outperforms other representative nonlinear IV methods in predicting the effect shape when the instrument is weak and can accurately estimate the effect function as well as identify the change point and predict its value under various structural model and effect shape scenarios. We further apply our framework to assess the nonlinear effect of alcohol consumption on systolic blood pressure using a genetic instrument (i.e. Mendelian randomization) with UK Biobank data. Our analysis detects a threshold beyond which alcohol intake exhibits a clear causal effect on the outcome. Our results are consistent with published medical guidelines.

笔记与分组