跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究复发事件与生存时间联合模型,纵向随访和计量经济学应用提及不足以直接判定为面板数据方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Chiung-Yu Huang
Mei-Cheng Wang

复发事件过程与失效时间数据的联合建模及估计

研究问题
当复发事件的观测终止时间与事件过程相关、独立删失条件可能失效时,如何联合建模复发事件与失效时间?
方法与思路
作者以共同个体潜变量连接事件强度与失效风险,先用复发事件估计潜变量,再将估计值用于失效时间模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称模型不对删失时间及潜变量分布作参数假设,允许模型下的信息性删失,并研究回归参数及基准累计风险估计性质。
阅读关注点
应核对共享潜变量的识别、允许的信息性删失机制、两步估计误差的传递,以及回归参数与累计风险的大样本条件。
阅读边界
材料为 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;允许信息性删失依赖所提模型,不能解释为无需任何删失或潜变量限制。

原文摘要

Recurrent event data are commonly encountered in longitudinal follow-up studies related to biomedical science, econometrics, reliability, and demography. In many studies, recurrent events serve as important measurements for evaluating disease progression, health deterioration, or insurance risk. When analyzing recurrent event data, an independent censoring condition is typically required for the construction of statistical methods. In some situations, however, the terminating time for observing recurrent events could be correlated with the recurrent event process, thus violating the assumption of independent censoring. In this article, we consider joint modeling of a recurrent event process and a failure time in which a common subject-specific latent variable is used to model the association between the intensity of the recurrent event process and the hazard of the failure time. The proposed joint model is flexible in that no parametric assumptions on the distributions of censoring times and latent variables are made, and under the model, informative censoring is allowed for observing both the recurrent events and failure times. We propose a "borrow-strength estimation procedure" by first estimating the value of the latent variable from recurrent event data, then using the estimated value in the failure time model. Some interesting implications and trajectories of the proposed model are presented. Properties of the regression parameter estimates and the estimated baseline cumulative hazard functions are also studied.

笔记与分组