跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将局部误设分析应用于极大似然估计的离散选择与时间序列模型,并讨论自回归误设,因此选择这两个方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Nicholas M. Kiefer
Gary R. Skoog

局部渐近设定误差分析

研究问题
当参数模型的约束被轻微违反时,受约束估计量的概率极限会如何偏离目标,能否对这种不一致性给出通用的近似公式?
方法与思路
作者基于似然函数在极大似然估计附近的局部线性近似,分析错误约束对估计量极限的影响,并将框架用于满足正则条件的优化估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称论文给出错误约束导致不一致性的近似公式,涵盖离散选择、时间序列及非线性回归例子;在线性回归中与既有公式一致。
阅读关注点
重点核对约束违反的局部尺度、目标函数的渐近条件与近似公式推导,并比较离散选择和自回归例子中局部结果与全局结果的差异。
阅读边界
所给材料指出局部与全局误设结果可能不同,摘要未说明完整正则条件;该分析关注估计量极限,不能据此判断任意程度误设的影响。

原文摘要

An approximation to the inconsistency introduced by imposing an incorrect restriction on a parametric model is given. The approximation can be applied to estimators generated by optimizing any objective function satisfying certain regularity conditions. Examples given include analysis of misspecification in discrete choice and time-series models estimated by maximum likelihood, and in a nonlinear regression model. SPECIFICATION ERROR ANALYSIS in the linear regression model has been studied by Theil [1], who gives formulas for, e.g., the effect of leaving out relevant variables on the expected values of the estimators of the coefficients of the included variables. In this paper we suggest analogous formulas for estimators obtained by optimizing an objective function subject to restrictions. We have in mind maximizing (1/n) x loglikelihood and will usually use this terminology. We consider the effect on the limit of the restricted estimator of a small violation of the restrictions. In the linear regression case our formula coincides with that given by Theil. In order to keep our results widely applicable and to avoid a mass of unnecessary detail we make assumptions on the asymptotic behavior of the loglikelihood function itself, rather than on the data-generating process per se. Many alternative sets of assumptions on the data densities can lead to the behavior we require of the loglikelihood functions. These will not be pursued here. The interested reader is referred to, e.g., White [12] for the case of independent observations and Kohn [8] for the time-series case. 1. GENERAL FORMULAS The general approach we take is based on a linear approximation to the likelihood function at the maximum likelihood estimator. It is in this sense that our analysis is local. For some models the local and global specification error results coincide; a well known case is the effect of omitted regressors in the linear regression model. Essentially the only cases involve linearity, although often there is agreement regarding the signs of the inconsistency. We show below that the local and global results even fail to coincide in the case of misspecified AR processes. Generally however, the global results are unknown.2 Taylor expansions are typically used together with assumptions on the data generating process to obtain the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator (Cramer [3]). In this paper we will not concern ourselves with asymptotic distributions of Vn -normed MLE's since these have been worked

笔记与分组
相关领域论文