跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦环境调查的抽样设计及方差近似,没有明确对应所列经济计量细分领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Stephen V. Stehman
W. Scott Overton

随机排序变概率系统抽样中Horvitz–Thompson估计量的方差估计比较

研究问题
研究固定样本量、随机排序的变概率系统抽样中,缺少全体纳入概率信息时,不同方差估计与成对纳入概率近似如何表现。
方法与思路
作者比较Horvitz–Thompson与Yates–Grundy方差估计,分别结合新近似和Hartley–Rao近似,并用经验研究考察总体特征的影响。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称Yates–Grundy的优势集中于响应与选择变量高度相关且变异系数近似相等的总体;其他情形中新近似方法表现相近。
阅读关注点
应核对随机排序模型与实际设计的关系、新成对纳入概率近似的定义,以及总体相关性和变异系数如何影响比较结果。
阅读边界
材料为OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;结论限定于所研究抽样和总体模型,近似公式未提供,不能推广至任意系统抽样或刊本。

原文摘要

The National Stream Survey (NSS) and Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) use variable probability, systematic sampling, and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator to estimate population parameters of ecological interest. A common strategy of variance estimation for systematic sampling is to assume that the population order had been randomized prior to sampling and to estimate variance under this randomized population model. The Yates-Grundy variance estimator is generally recommended for estimating the variance of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator under this model. But design features of NSS and EMAP preclude application of the Yates-Grundy estimator, so use of the Horvitz-Thompson variance estimator is required. Further, because the first-order inclusion probabilities are known only for the sample units and not the entire population, neither the actual pairwise inclusion probabilities (πuv's) nor the Hartley-Rao approximation of the πuv's can be computed. Thus the variance estimator proposed for use in these surveys was the Horvitz-Thompson variance estimator computed with a new approximation to the πuv's. Having to use this estimator, denoted v o HT, motivated exploration of the general question of when behaviors of the Horvitz-Thompson and Yates-Grundy variance estimators differ and also investigation of the specific performance of the estimator v o HT.To permit comparison of variance estimators, we restricted attention to fixed sample size, variable probability systematic sampling, from a randomly sorted list. Properties of v o HT were compared to those of three other variance estimators; the Yates-Grundy estimator calculated with both the new πuv approximation and the Hartley-Rao approximation, and the Horvitz-Thompson variance estimator calculated with the Hartley-Rao approximation. An empirical study, designed to permit generalization beyond a few special case populations, demonstrated that superiority of the Yates-Grundy variance estimator was restricted to populations having both high correlation between the response variable, y, and the selection variable, x, and approximately equal coefficients of variation for the x and y populations. With the exception of these populations, v o HT performed nearly the same as the Yates-Grundy estimators studied and performed better than the Horvitz-Thompson variance estimator computed with the Hartley-Rao approximation. In NSS and EMAP most response variables are not expected to be highly correlated with the selection variable, so v o HT should furnish an adequate variance approximation when the randomized population model holds.

笔记与分组