跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主要研究气候空间依赖下的多重检验,季节预报应用未提供宏观经济预测或所列因果识别方法的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

Spatially Dependent Multiple Testing Under Model Misspecification, With Application to Detection of Anthropogenic Influence on Extreme Climate Events

模型误设下的空间相依多重检验及极端气候归因应用

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mark D. Risser
Dáithí A. Stone

模型误设下的空间相依多重检验及极端气候归因应用

研究问题
全球极端天气归因涉及大量空间相关检验时,如何在统计模型可能误设的情况下控制错误发现,并避免依赖处理损害检验能力?
方法与思路
作者结合贝叶斯决策理论与非参数层级模型处理相依多重检验,在包含空间依赖的模拟框架中评价,并应用于季节预报。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该方法允许灵活指定决策标准,控制错误发现并对模型误设具有稳健性,模拟展示稳健表现并讨论业务流程实施。
阅读关注点
应核对错误发现控制的具体定义与评价口径、损失函数及层级模型,以及误设类型、空间依赖设定和气候归因判断的依据。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;错误控制条件和稳健性范围未说明,不能推断对任意误设均有效。

原文摘要

The Weather Risk Attribution Forecast (WRAF) is a forecasting tool that uses output from global climate models to make simultaneous attribution statements about whether and how greenhouse gas emissions have contributed to extreme weather across the globe. However, in conducting a large number of simultaneous hypothesis tests, the WRAF is prone to identifying false “discoveries.” A common technique for addressing this multiple testing problem is to adjust the procedure in a way that controls the proportion of true null hypotheses that are incorrectly rejected, or the false discovery rate (FDR). Unfortunately, generic FDR procedures suffer from low power when the hypotheses are dependent, and techniques designed to account for dependence are sensitive to misspecification of the underlying statistical model. In this article, we develop a Bayesian decision-theoretical approach for dependent multiple testing and a nonparametric hierarchical statistical model that flexibly controls false discovery and is robust to model misspecification. We illustrate the robustness of our procedure to model error with a simulation study, using a framework that accounts for generic spatial dependence and allows the practitioner to flexibly specify the decision criteria. Finally, we apply our procedure to several seasonal forecasts and discuss implementation for the WRAF workflow. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文