Improved Estimation in a Contingency Table: Independence Structure
利用独立性结构改进列联表概率估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般列联表概率估计与收缩风险,未明确对应所列经济计量细分方向。
利用独立性结构改进列联表概率估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Estimation of the cell probabilities in a two-way contingency table is considered when it is plausible that the table might have an independence structure relating to the two traits. In a classical nonparametric setup, the unrestricted maximum likelihood estimators of the cell probabilities are the corresponding sample proportions; under the assumption of independence, the restricted estimators are the product of the respective row and column sample proportions. The latter estimators behave better than the former when independence actually holds, but a different picture may emerge for possible departure from the assumed independence structure; the restricted estimators may be heavily biased, inefficient, and even inconsistent. For this reason, a preliminary test on independence based on the classical contingency chi-squared statistic may be conveniently incorporated in the formulation of a preliminary test estimator of the matrix of cell probabilities. Since, typically, we have a multiparameter estimation problem, a pretest or shrinkage estimator based on the classical Stein rule may also be formulated in the same vein. The primary objective of this article is to focus on the asymptotic distribution theory of all four estimators under the null hypothesis of independence as well as local Pitman-type alternatives. The bias and risk based on suitable quadratic loss functions of these estimators are considered in the same asymptotic setup, and these are then incorporated in the study of the asymptotic relative performance of these estimators. In the light of their asymptotic risks, neither the preliminary test nor the shrinkage estimators dominates the other, though each fares well relative to the unrestricted or the restricted maximum likelihood estimators.