跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般列联表概率估计与收缩风险,未明确对应所列经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Arjun K. Gupta
Pranab K. Sen

利用独立性结构改进列联表概率估计

研究问题
二维列联表可能具有独立性结构时,如何兼顾结构成立时的估计收益,以及偏离独立性时的偏差和风险?
方法与思路
作者比较无约束、独立性约束、预检验和 Stein 型收缩估计,在独立性原假设及局部备择下研究渐近分布与二次损失风险。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称预检验与收缩估计在所考察渐近风险下互不支配,同时各自在相应情形中相对无约束或约束估计表现较好。
阅读关注点
应核对局部备择的设定、损失函数与风险比较范围,尤其关注独立性误设时的偏差,以及预检验阈值和收缩规则。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化。局部渐近风险比较不能直接作为全局或有限样本优越性结论。

原文摘要

Estimation of the cell probabilities in a two-way contingency table is considered when it is plausible that the table might have an independence structure relating to the two traits. In a classical nonparametric setup, the unrestricted maximum likelihood estimators of the cell probabilities are the corresponding sample proportions; under the assumption of independence, the restricted estimators are the product of the respective row and column sample proportions. The latter estimators behave better than the former when independence actually holds, but a different picture may emerge for possible departure from the assumed independence structure; the restricted estimators may be heavily biased, inefficient, and even inconsistent. For this reason, a preliminary test on independence based on the classical contingency chi-squared statistic may be conveniently incorporated in the formulation of a preliminary test estimator of the matrix of cell probabilities. Since, typically, we have a multiparameter estimation problem, a pretest or shrinkage estimator based on the classical Stein rule may also be formulated in the same vein. The primary objective of this article is to focus on the asymptotic distribution theory of all four estimators under the null hypothesis of independence as well as local Pitman-type alternatives. The bias and risk based on suitable quadratic loss functions of these estimators are considered in the same asymptotic setup, and these are then incorporated in the study of the asymptotic relative performance of these estimators. In the light of their asymptotic risks, neither the preliminary test nor the shrinkage estimators dominates the other, though each fares well relative to the unrestricted or the restricted maximum likelihood estimators.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文