跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要针对断点回归设计提出基线协变量分布连续性的可信性检验。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ivan A Canay
Vishal Kamat

断点回归中的近似置换检验与诱导次序统计量

研究问题
断点附近有效样本很少时,如何检验基线协变量的整个分布在阈值处连续,从而为断点回归设计的可信性提供诊断?
方法与思路
作者基于诱导次序统计量提出置换检验,令局部观测数$q$在$n\to \infty$时固定,以渐近框架逼近阈值附近的小样本现象。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,检验在较弱条件下渐近有效、更强条件下有限样本有效,相对均值检验具有良好功效,并提供模拟和选举应用。
阅读关注点
应核对固定$q$框架中局部观测的选取、渐近与有限样本有效性的不同条件,以及分布检验相对均值检验的功效比较范围。
阅读边界
摘要未列明两类有效性条件或模拟设定;协变量连续性检验是设计诊断,不能单凭不拒绝原假设就确认断点因果识别成立。

原文摘要

In the regression discontinuity design (RDD), it is common practice to assess the credibility of the design by testing whether the means of baseline covariates do not change at the cut-off (or threshold) of the running variable. This practice is partly motivated by the stronger implication derived by Lee (2008), who showed that under certain conditions the distribution of baseline covariates in the RDD must be continuous at the cut-off. We propose a permutation test based on the so-called induced ordered statistics for the null hypothesis of continuity of the distribution of baseline covariates at the cut-off; and introduce a novel asymptotic framework to analyse its properties. The asymptotic framework is intended to approximate a small sample phenomenon: even though the total number $n$ of observations may be large, the number of effective observations local to the cut-off is often small. Thus, while traditional asymptotics in RDD require a growing number of observations local to the cut-off as $n\to \infty$, our framework keeps the number $q$ of observations local to the cut-off fixed as $n\to \infty$. The new test is easy to implement, asymptotically valid under weak conditions, exhibits finite sample validity under stronger conditions than those needed for its asymptotic validity, and has favourable power properties relative to tests based on means. In a simulation study, we find that the new test controls size remarkably well across designs. We then use our test to evaluate the plausibility of the design in Lee (2008), a well-known application of the RDD to study incumbency advantage.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文