Fast Mixing of Data Augmentation Algorithms: Bayesian Probit, Logit, and Lasso Regression
数据增强算法的快速混合:贝叶斯Probit、Logit与Lasso回归AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要内容为贝叶斯Probit、Logit与Lasso回归中数据增强抽样算法的混合时间理论,属于马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛与贝叶斯计算方向,未涉及所提供领域细分中的因果推断、面板、离散选择、结构估计、时间序列或金融计量等主题,故不选择任何细分领域。
数据增强算法的快速混合:贝叶斯Probit、Logit与Lasso回归AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We propose using a modified conductance-based method to study the mixing time of an important class of two-block Gibbs samplers, the data augmentation (DA) algorithm. %, which is of prominent interest in both theoretical and empirical research. Using this method, we prove the first non-asymptotic polynomial upper bounds on mixing times of three important DA algorithms: DA algorithms for Bayesian Probit regression (Albert and Chib, 1993, ProbitDA) and Bayesian Logit regression (Polson, Scott, and Windle, 2013, LogitDA), and Bayesian Lasso Regression (Park and Casella, 2008, Rajaratnam et al., 2015, LassoDA). Concretely, for ProbitDA and LogitDA, we demonstrate a tight bound that explicitly depends on the design matrix and prior covariance matrix. Under the assumption that data are independently generated from either a sub-Gaussian or log-concave distribution and properly scaled, the bound implies that with $η$-warm start, parameter dimension $d$, and sample size $n$, with high probability over data, the two algorithms require $\mathcal{O}\left(n\log \left(\frac{\log η}ε\right)\right)$ steps to obtain samples with at most $ε$ error in TV, KL, or $χ^2$ distance. Meanwhile, we show that under minimal data assumptions, LassoDA requires $\mathcal{O}\left(d^2(d\log d +n \log n)^2 \log \left(\fracηε\right)\right)$ steps to achieve $ε$-accuracy in TV distance. The results are generally applicable to settings with large $n$ and large $d$, including settings with highly imbalanced response data in Probit and Logit regression. We compare them with the best known guarantees of Langevin Monte Carlo and Metropolis Adjusted Langevin Algorithm. We evaluate our theoretical results using numerical examples, and discuss the mixing times of the three algorithms under feasible initialization.