跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究完全随机实验中的处理效应估计与基于随机分配的因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xin Lu
Fan Yang
Yuhao Wang

中高维协变量下完全随机实验的去偏回归调整

研究问题
在完全随机实验中,当协变量维数可与样本量同阶且不假设潜在结果线性表示稀疏时,如何有效估计处理效应?
方法与思路
作者在协变量与潜在结果固定、随机性仅来自处理分配的框架下,构造去偏回归调整估计量及相应推断程序。
材料陈述的贡献
预印本摘要称在温和条件下建立渐近正态性,无需稀疏约束,并讨论不同维数约束下相对未调整估计量的效率改善。
阅读关注点
应核对允许的维数增长、去偏构造、渐近正态性与方差估计条件,以及效率改善结论对应的具体范围。
阅读边界
本次依据 arXiv 预印本摘要,不能据此声称已同行评审或获期刊接收;具体假设、效率范围及后续刊本变化未提供。

原文摘要

Completely randomized experiment is the gold standard for causal inference. When the covariate information for each experimental candidate is available, one typical way is to include them in covariate adjustments for more accurate treatment effect estimation. In this paper, we investigate this problem under the randomization-based framework, i.e., that the covariates and potential outcomes of all experimental candidates are assumed as deterministic quantities and the randomness comes solely from the treatment assignment mechanism. Under this framework, to achieve asymptotically valid inference, existing estimators usually require either (i) that the dimension of covariates $p$ is much smaller than the sample size $n$; or (ii) certain sparsity constraints on the linear representations of potential outcomes constructed via possibly high-dimensional covariates. In this paper, we consider the moderately high-dimensional regime where $p$ is allowed to be in the same order of magnitude as $n$. We develop a novel debiased estimator with a corresponding inference procedure and establish its asymptotic normality under mild assumptions. Our estimator is model-free and does not require any sparsity constraint on potential outcome's linear representations. We also discuss its asymptotic efficiency improvements over the unadjusted treatment effect estimator under different dimensionality constraints. Numerical analysis confirms that compared to other regression adjustment based treatment effect estimators, our debiased estimator performs well in moderately high dimensions.

笔记与分组