跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用潜在结果、反事实效用与部分识别来研究政策学习。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Eli Ben-Michael
Kosuke Imai
Zhichao Jiang

具有非对称反事实效用的政策学习

研究问题
当决策效用依赖不同动作下潜在结果的联合分布,并对造成伤害与错失收益赋予不同成本时,如何从观测数据学习政策?
方法与思路
作者先对无法点识别的预期效用进行部分识别,再以不同替代政策为参照构造极小极大损失规则,并转化为分类问题。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称可通过中间分类任务学习决策规则,并将有限样本超额预期效用损失界与分类器遗憾联系起来。
阅读关注点
应核对潜在结果联合分布的识别边界、替代政策的选择、效用成本设定,以及分类误差如何传递至政策损失。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 摘要;识别假设、效用界的具体形式与医疗应用结果未提供,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Data-driven decision making plays an important role even in high stakes settings like medicine and public policy. Learning optimal policies from observed data requires a careful formulation of the utility function whose expected value is maximized across a population. Although researchers typically use utilities that depend on observed outcomes alone, in many settings the decision maker’s utility function is more properly characterized by the joint set of potential outcomes under all actions. For example, the Hippocratic principle to “do no harm” implies that the cost of causing death to a patient who would otherwise survive without treatment is greater than the cost of forgoing life-saving treatment. We consider optimal policy learning with asymmetric counterfactual utility functions of this form that consider the joint set of potential outcomes. We show that asymmetric counterfactual utilities lead to an unidentifiable expected utility function, and so we first partially identify it. Drawing on statistical decision theory, we then derive minimax decision rules by minimizing the maximum expected utility loss relative to different alternative policies. We show that one can learn minimax loss decision rules from observed data by solving intermediate classification problems, and establish that the finite sample excess expected utility loss of this procedure is bounded by the regret of these intermediate classifiers. We apply this conceptual framework and methodology to the decision about whether or not to use right heart catheterization for patients with possible pulmonary hypertension. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文