Complier Stochastic Direct Effects: Identification and Robust Estimation
依从者随机直接效应:识别与稳健估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论工具变量随机化、中介路径和直接效应的识别与估计。
依从者随机直接效应:识别与稳健估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Mediation analysis is critical to understanding the mechanisms underlying exposure-outcome relationships. In this paper, we identify the instrumental variable-direct effect of the exposure on the outcome not through the mediator, using randomization of the instrument. We call this estimand the complier stochastic direct effect (CSDE). To our knowledge, such an estimand has not previously been considered or estimated. We propose and evaluate several estimators for the CSDE: a ratio of inverse-probability of treatment-weighted estimators (IPTW), a ratio of estimating equation estimators (EE), a ratio of targeted minimum loss-based estimators (TMLE), and a TMLE that targets the CSDE directly. These estimators are applicable for a variety of study designs, including randomized encouragement trials, like the Moving to Opportunity housing voucher experiment we consider as an illustrative example, treatment discontinuities, and Mendelian randomization. We found the IPTW estimator to be the most sensitive to finite sample bias, resulting in bias of over 40% even when all models were correctly specified in a sample size of N=100. In contrast, the EE estimator and TMLE that targets the CSDE directly were far less sensitive. The EE and TML estimators also have advantages in terms of efficiency and reduced reliance on correct parametric model specification.