Bandwidth selection: classical or plug-in?
带宽选择：经典方法还是插件法？AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要讨论通用非参数平滑的带宽选择，未明确涉及所列分布效应或其他具体计量领域。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
带宽选择：经典方法还是插件法？
- 研究问题
- 核密度估计与局部回归中，插件带宽法优于交叉验证等经典方法的证据是否可靠，比较差异来自哪些选择与理论处理？
- 方法与思路
- 作者重新审视既有比较证据，分析先导带宽设定、欠平滑与过平滑表现，并从曲率信息利用及渐近效率角度讨论差异。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称插件法依赖先导带宽且可能遗漏重要特征，并质疑既有渐近比较的公平性，指出其研究中插件估计可被先导估计超越。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对被比较的具体带宽规则、先导设定和评价损失，检查困难实例与渐近论证的条件，以及批评覆盖哪些插件方法。
- 阅读边界
- 依据 OpenAlex 索引摘要，稿件版本未注明；具体比较条件与证据未提供，不能把作者的批评扩展为所有插件法均较差。
原文摘要
Bandwidth selection for procedures such as kernel density estimation and local regression have been widely studied over the past decade. Substantial “evidence” has been collected to establish superior performance of modern plug-in methods in comparison to methods such as cross validation; this has ranged from detailed analysis of rates of convergence, to simulations, to superior performance on real datasets. In this work we take a detailed look at some of this evidence, looking into the sources of differences. Our findings challenge the claimed superiority of plug-in methods on several fronts. First, plug-in methods are heavily dependent on arbitrary specification of pilot bandwidths and fail when this specification is wrong. Second, the often-quoted variability and undersmoothing of cross validation simply reflects the uncertainty of band-width selection; plug-in methods reflect this uncertainty by oversmoothing and missing important features when given difficult problems. Third, we look at asymptotic theory. Plug-in methods use available curvature information in an inefficient manner, resulting in inefficient estimates. Previous comparisons with classical approaches penalized the classical approaches for this inefficiency. Asymptotically, the plug-in based estimates are beaten by their own pilot estimates.