Partial correlation screening for estimating large precision matrices, with applications to classification
用于大型精度矩阵估计的偏相关筛选及其分类应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用高维精度矩阵估计与微阵列分类,没有明确涉及所列经济、宏观或金融细分领域,故不强行归类。
用于大型精度矩阵估计的偏相关筛选及其分类应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Given $n$ samples $X_{1},X_{2},\ldots,X_{n}$ from $N(0,\Sigma)$, we are interested in estimating the $p\times p$ precision matrix $\Omega=\Sigma^{-1}$; we assume $\Omega$ is sparse in that each row has relatively few nonzeros. We propose Partial Correlation Screening (PCS) as a new row-by-row approach. To estimate the $i$th row of $\Omega$, $1\leq i\leq p$, PCS uses a Screen step and a Clean step. In the Screen step, PCS recruits a (small) subset of indices using a stage-wise algorithm, where in each stage, the algorithm updates the set of recruited indices by adding the index $j$ that has the largest empirical partial correlation (in magnitude) with $i$, given the set of indices recruited so far. In the Clean step, PCS reinvestigates all recruited indices, removes false positives and uses the resultant set of indices to reconstruct the $i$th row. PCS is computationally efficient and modest in memory use: to estimate a row of $\Omega$, it only needs a few rows (determined sequentially) of the empirical covariance matrix. PCS is able to execute an estimation of a large $\Omega$ (e.g., $p=10K$) in a few minutes. Higher Criticism Thresholding (HCT) is a recent classifier that enjoys optimality, but to exploit its full potential, we need a good estimate of $\Omega$. Note that given an estimate of $\Omega$, we can always combine it with HCT to build a classifier (e.g., HCT-PCS, HCT-glasso). We have applied HCT-PCS to two microarray data sets ($p=8K$ and $10K$) for classification, where it not only significantly outperforms HCT-glasso, but also is competitive to the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF). These suggest that PCS gives more useful estimates of $\Omega$ than the glasso; we study this carefully and have gained some interesting insight. We show that in a broad context, PCS fully recovers the support of $\Omega$ and HCT-PCS is optimal in classification. Our theoretical study sheds interesting light on the behavior of stage-wise procedures.