On the asymptotic validity of confidence sets for linear functionals of solutions to integral equations
积分方程解的线性泛函置信集合的渐近有效性AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将近端因果推断的平均处理效应和工具变量模型的效应对比列为目标参数实例。
积分方程解的线性泛函置信集合的渐近有效性AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Summary This paper examines the construction of confidence sets for parameters defined as linear functionals of a function of $ W $ and $ X $ whose conditional mean given $ Z $ and $ X $ equals the conditional mean of another variable $ Y $ given $ Z $ and $ X $. Many estimands of interest in causal inference can be expressed in this form, including the average treatment effect in proximal causal inference and treatment effect contrasts in instrumental variable models. We derive a necessary condition for a confidence set to be uniformly valid over a model that allows for the dependence between $ W $ and $ Z $ given $ X $ to be arbitrarily weak. We show that, for any such confidence set, there must exist some laws in the model under which, with high probability, the confidence set has a diameter greater than or equal to the diameter of the parameter’s range. In particular, consistent with the weak instrument literature, Wald confidence intervals are not uniformly valid over the aforementioned model when the parameter’s range is infinite. Furthermore, we argue that inverting the score test, a successful approach in that literature, generally fails for the broader class of parameters considered here. We present a method for constructing uniformly valid confidence sets when all variables, but possibly $ Y $, are binary, discuss its limitations and emphasize that developing valid confidence sets for the class of parameters considered here remains an open problem.