跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究生存数据的长度偏倚与删失,未直接涉及所列分位数或分布效应方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Masoud Asgharian
Cyr Emile M'Lan
David B Wolfson

伴随右删失的长度偏倚抽样

研究问题
横截面现患病例产生长度偏倚且存在右删失时,如何估计无偏生存函数,并利用截断分布信息开展无条件分析?
方法与思路
作者针对纯长度偏倚数据构造无条件非参数极大似然估计并研究其渐近性质,同时用痴呆生存实例比较条件与无条件估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称补充了删失情形下无条件生存函数估计及其渐近性质的结果,并讨论已知截断分布信息对分析的作用。
阅读关注点
应核对纯长度偏倚的定义、均匀截断设定及删失条件,以及无条件似然如何利用信息和实例中两类估计的比较。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 摘要;未说明完整抽样和删失条件,不能推断无条件方法在所有截断机制下更有效。

原文摘要

When survival data arise from prevalent cases ascertained through a cross-sectional study, it is well known that the survivor function corresponding to these data is length biased and different from the survivor function derived from incident cases. Length-biased data have been treated both unconditionally and conditionally in the literature. In the latter case, where length bias is viewed as being induced by random left truncation of the survival times, the truncating distribution is assumed to be unknown. Conditioning on the observed truncation times hence causes very little loss of information. In many instances, however, it can be supposed that the truncating distribution is uniform, and it has been pointed out that under these circumstances, an unconditional analysis will be more informative. There are no results in the current literature that give the asymptotic properties of the unconditional nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) of the unbiased survivor function in the presence of censoring. This article fills that gap by giving this NPMLE and its accompanying asymptotic properties when the data are purely length biased. An example of survival with dementia is presented in which the conditional and unconditional estimators are compared.

笔记与分组