A Test for Treatment Heterogeneity under a Distributional Difference-in-Difference Framework
分布双重差分框架下的处理异质性检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接结合双重差分因果设计与完整结果分布检验,关注位置、尺度、形状及尾部的处理效应。
分布双重差分框架下的处理异质性检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We develop a novel distributional Difference-in-Differences (DiD) framework to capture treatment heterogeneity across outcome distributions. By leveraging optimal transport, we use the control group to estimate the untreated distributional drift from the pre- to post-treatment period and apply it to the treated group's pre-treatment baseline, constructing a counterfactual distribution under the assumption of no treatment effect. We frame the null hypothesis as a distributional equality between the transported counterfactual distribution and the observed treated post-treatment distribution, and test it using a maximum mean discrepancy statistic in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The resulting nonparametric omnibus test is sensitive to changes in location, scale, shape, and tail behavior. Under the null, we derive the asymptotic Gaussian quadratic-form limit of the test statistic, while under local alternatives, we provide a unified characterization of power that establishes its Pitman local power and moderate-deviation consistency. Our theory reveals how detectability is shaped by the interaction between transport-induced drift and RKHS geometry. Simulations and an application to the Card--Krueger minimum-wage data demonstrate that the proposed method identifies key distributional treatment effects missed by classical mean-based DiD.
利用替代指标辅助缺失主要结局的高效跨总体分布与分位数处理效应估计
We study target-population distributional and quantile treatment effects when a source study observes treatment and post-treatment surrogates for all source units but observes a long-run primary outcome only for a validation subset, while the target population contributes only baseline covariates. The target estimands are transported counterfactual distribution functions $ψ_a(y)=P(Y^a\le y\mid R=0)$, their quantiles $q_a(τ)$, and the quantile treatment effect $Δ(τ)=q_1(τ)-q_0(τ)$…
通用双重差分的非参数框架
Difference-in-differences (DiD) is a popular approach to evaluate treatment effects in settings where both pre- and post-treatment measurements of the outcome are available. Despite its popularity, existing methods face important limitations. Specifically, they either: (i) only apply to continuous outcomes and the average treatment effect on the treated; (ii) are sensitive to the transformation of the outcome; (iii) rely on a no unmeasured confounding assumption given…
尖锐回归折点设计中局部处理效应识别与推断的统一框架
This paper develops a unified framework for the identification, estimation, and uniform inference of local treatment effects (LTEs) in sharp regression kink designs (RKDs). These LTEs quantify the effect of a marginal change in the treatment at the kink point on various features of the outcome distribution. The identification strategy applies to Hadamard-differentiable functionals of the outcome distribution -- including means, quantiles, and inequality measures -- and…
去偏且具有半参数效率的变化中变化估计量
We present a novel extension of the influential changes-in-changes (CiC) framework of Athey and Imbens (2006) for estimating the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) and distributional causal effects in panel data with unmeasured confounding. While CiC relaxes the parallel trends assumption in difference-in-differences (DiD), existing methods typically assume a scalar unobserved confounder and monotonic outcome relationships, and lack inference tools that…
通过统一半参数双重差分方法估计处理效应
Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches are widely used for estimating causal effects with observational data before and after an intervention. DID traditionally estimates the average treatment effect among the treated after making a parallel trends assumption on the means of the outcome. With skewed outcomes, a transformation is often needed; however, the transformation may be difficult to choose, results may be sensitive to the choice, and parallel trends assumptions…
流行病学因果推断中的通用双重差分
Difference-in-differences is undoubtedly one of the most widely used methods for evaluating the causal effect of an intervention in observational (i.e., nonrandomized) settings. The approach is typically used when pre- and post-exposure outcome measurements are available, and one can reasonably assume that the association of the unobserved confounder with the outcome has the same absolute magnitude in the two exposure arms, and is constant over time; a so-called parallel…